PAUL SUCGANG, D.O., INC
NPI 1508178930, organization, San Gabriel, CA, Family Medicine
- Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list and the Medicare revocation list since September 12, 2024.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 2 later months, $3,907 in total.
Public list actions
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA Medicaid exclusion list ca medi-cal suspended & ineligible provider list (july 2026) | Exact NPI, name verified | Sep 12, 2024 | still open | 2 | Oct 2024 | Nov 2024 | $4K | $19K |
| Medicare revocation list 424.535(a)(19) affiliation that poses an undue risk | Exact NPI, name verified | Sep 12, 2024 | Sep 11, 2034 | 2 | Oct 2024 | Nov 2024 | $4K | $19K |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | PAUL SUCGANG, D.O., INC (also SUCGANG FAMILY MEDICINE) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | July 14, 2010, last updated June 13, 2025 |
| Practice location | 207 S SANTA ANITA ST STE G18, San Gabriel, CA 91776-1147, 626-389-8448 |
| Authorized official | Paul Sucgang (Owner) |
| Specialties | Family Medicine (207Q00000X, primary, license 20A9629 CA) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99214 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $59K | 87% | $50 | $60 (top 5% from $133) | 39th percentile | |
| 99487 | Complex chronic care management services for two or more chronic conditions, first 60 minutes of clinical staff time directed by health care professional, per calendar month | $6K | 9% | $34 | $8.83 (top 5% from $101) | 80th percentile | |
| 99211 | Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of established patient that may not require presence of healthcare professional | $1K | 2% | $84 | $16 (top 5% from $128) | too few months to rank | |
| 99202 | New patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 15 minutes or more | $928 | 1% | $66 | $45 (top 5% from $138) | too few months to rank | |
| 93000 | Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report | $431 | 1% | $18 | $11 (top 5% from $25) | too few months to rank |
In this area
399 providers in Los Angeles County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $129.6M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 347 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 36. 52 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BURBANK PREFERRED PROVIDER MEDICAL GROUP, INC Burbank, CA, ranked 17 | $67K |
|
| 1 | GOLDEN STAR LABS LLC Los Angeles, CA, ranked 32 | $41.0M |
|
| 1 | MATIAS CLINICAL LABORATORY INC Baldwin Park, CA, ranked 43 | $3.8M |
|
| 1 | HEALTHSMART PACIFIC INC Long Beach, CA, ranked 52 | $1.6M |
|
| 1 | LINDA WARREN-WATSON Lancaster, CA, ranked 71 | $828K |
|
| 1 | SOHRAB MOSHIRI Woodland Hills, CA, ranked 82 | $483K |
|
| 1 | QUALITY FAMILY HOSPICE CARE INC Tarzana, CA, ranked 92 | $375K |
|
| 1 | MARATHON HOSPICE CARE INC. North Hollywood, CA, ranked 95 | $368K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.