Providers

KEVIN PATEL, MD

NPI 1508285966, individual, Charleston, SC, Internal Medicine

1
Evidence tier
documented action, then payment
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since February 18, 2021.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 8 later months, $25,913 in total.
score 94 of 100, rank 226, $26K at stake

Public list actions

Medicare revocation effective February 18, 2021, barred from re-enrolling until September 6, 2028
424.535(a)(4) false or misleading information and 424.535(a)(3) felonies, Practitioner - Internal Medicine, SC

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
Medicare revocation list
424.535(a)(4) false or misleading information and 424.535(a)(3) felonies
Exact NPI, name verifiedFeb 18, 2021Sep 6, 20288Mar 2021Nov 2021$26K$4K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameKEVIN PATEL, MD
TypeIndividual, sole proprietor
StatusActive
NPI issuedApril 14, 2014, last updated November 11, 2020
Practice location51 NASSAU ST, Charleston, SC 29403-5513, 843-722-4112
Specialties
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program (390200000X)
Internal Medicine (207R00000X, primary, license 51408 SC)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$18K60%$153$60 (top 5% from $133)97th percentile
T1015Medicaid service code$12K40%$104$182 (top 5% from $488)23rd percentile

In this area

11 providers in Charleston County, SC carry an indicator in the public record, with $6.0M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 6 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 4.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3ROPER ST FRANCIS ANCILLARY SERVICES
Ladson, SC, ranked 804
$328K
  • Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code A9900 ($504 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
3LUTHERAN HOMES OF SC, INC.
MT Pleasant, SC, ranked 4250
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00104, ranked 104 nationally.
3ROPER HOSPITAL INC
Ladson, SC, ranked 5775
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
3BISHOP GADSDEN EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT COMMUNITY
Charleston, SC, ranked 6977
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
4DARREN PERRY
North Charleston, SC, ranked 7349
$208K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month under one organization, which can be supervisory billing.
  • Records needed.
  • and 2 more
4AMANDA ACREE
Mount Pleasant, SC, ranked 7728
$1.7M
  • Hours beyond a day in 8 months under one organization, which can be supervisory billing.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4SHIRLEY FORD
N Charleston, SC, ranked 8745
$1.9M
  • Hours beyond a day in 12 months, but with up to 517 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
5STEVEN LOPEZ
N Charleston, SC, ranked 9997
$1.8M
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 90833 ($211 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
All 11 in SC

Recent enforcement in SC

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJIndictedMar 11, 2026
Former Greenville CEO, Employees Indicted in Multi-Million Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme
The defendants submitted false claims to health care benefit programs for individual COVID-19 tests that had actually been pooled for combined processing and manipulated test processing software, billing for tests that were virtually worthless and ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJSentencedFeb 25, 2026
Lancaster Trio Sentenced for Health Care Fraud Conspiracy
An excluded Medicaid provider and his wife established Transformation Services in her name to bill Medicaid for behavioral health services that were overlapping, not rendered individually, and provided by unlicensed therapists, defrauding Medicaid of nearly $250,000.
DOJIndictedNov 18, 2025
Florida Man Indicted for Health Care Fraud, Wire Fraud in Durable Medical Equipment Scheme
Weinberger, who was excluded from Medicare, allegedly concealed his ownership and control of a Medicare-enrolled durable medical equipment company through a false enrollment document and, with coconspirators, used call centers to generate doctors' orders for orthotic braces and submit approximately $6.7 million in false and fraudulent claims obtained through kickbacks and bribes, medically unnecessary, or otherwise ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJCivil judgmentJul 17, 2025
United States and the States of Georgia, Colorado, and South Carolina Obtain $114.5M in Judgments in a Sprawling Cancer Genetic Testing Lab Scheme
Premier Medical, its owner and compliance vice president paid kickbacks to Freedom Medical Labs and its marketers, who collected DNA samples from Medicaid beneficiaries in public spaces and purchased telemedicine physician orders, to bill Medicaid for medically unnecessary cancer genetic testing.
DOJIndictedJun 30, 2025
S.C. Cases Among Hundreds Announced in National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Two defendants were charged with submitting false claims to Medicare and Medicaid for durable medical equipment that was not delivered or authorized, and with billing the Veterans Administration for massage therapy services not rendered.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.