Providers

NARINDER SINGH

NPI 1518921998, individual, Oroville, CA, Internal Medicine

4
Evidence tier
structure or single-organization volume
  • Hours beyond a day in 5 months, but with up to 1755 patients a month across 4 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
score 51 of 100, rank 8846, $1.4M at stake

Hours billed per day

Medicaid billing converted into hours of hands-on care per day. The lower bound counts one unit per claim line and needs no price; the other two divide dollars by a unit price, the conservative one at 1.5 times the price. The clinician on the claim may be a supervisor under state rules, so billing organizations are counted too.

monthwhat was foundhours per day, lower boundhours per day, at pricehours per day, conservativeper working daypatientsbilling organizationscodespaid
Jan 2020More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line27.724.616.422.11446499202 99212 99213$26K
Feb 2020More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line27.824.916.624.11401499202 99212 99213$25K
Aug 2021More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line25.629.619.727.81592399202 99212 99213$30K
Sep 2021More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line27.132.321.529.41611399202 99212 99213$31K
Jan 2022More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line28.632.321.531.81755399202 99212 99213$35K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameNARINDER SINGH
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedApril 13, 2006, last updated July 13, 2026
Practice location2721 OLIVE HWY, STE 12, Oroville, CA 95966, 530-533-6061
Specialties
Internal Medicine (207R00000X, primary, license A64182 CA)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
T1015Medicaid service code$10.0M82%$125$182 (top 5% from $488)29th percentile
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$1.2M10%$20$44 (top 5% from $110)16th percentile
G0467Federally qualified health center (fqhc) visit, established patient; a medically-necessary, face-to-face encounter (one-on-one) between an established patient and a fqhc practitioner during which time one or more fqhc services are rendered and includes a t$442K4%$73$20 (top 5% from $124)89th percentile
99212Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more$315K3%$15$28 (top 5% from $147)28th percentile
99202New patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 15 minutes or more$66K1%$22$45 (top 5% from $138)18th percentile
93010Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only$65K1%$3.30$5.72 (top 5% from $13)12th percentile
93306Ultrasound of heart with color-depicted blood flow, rate, direction and valve function$53K0%$9.07$52 (top 5% from $244)1st percentile
99205New patient office or other outpatient visit with a high level of medical decision making, if using time, 60 minutes or more$9K0%$54$128 (top 5% from $249)too few months to rank
Medicare Part B 2024, largest codes
codewhat it isservicesbeneficiariespaidsubmitted per serviceallowed per servicecharge to allowedusual for this code
93306Ultrasound of heart with color-depicted blood flow, rate, direction and valve function2,7702,396$135K$82$681.2x3.4x (90th percentile 7.7x)
93010Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report only8,9443,570$52K$83$810.3x6.0x (90th percentile 11.9x)
93018Exercise or drug-induced heart stress test with electrocardiogram (ecg) with review by physician650637$7K$142$1410.3x3.7x (90th percentile 13.2x)
93272Electrocardiogram (ecg) up to 30 days continuous with symptom monitoring, transmission and review and report by health care professional271263$5K$32$241.3x3.5x (90th percentile 7.1x)
93312Ultrasound of heart with probe in esophagus, with report4140$3K$125$1021.2x3.8x (90th percentile 9.8x)
93307Ultrasound of heart7773$2K$35$341.0x3.5x (90th percentile 8.4x)
93350Ultrasound of heart during rest, exercise and/or drug-induced stress with report4040$2K$95$681.4x3.6x (90th percentile 8.6x)
93244Heart rhythm review, and interpretation of continous external ekg over more than 48 hours up to 7 days7977$1K$97$234.3x3.2x (90th percentile 5.8x)

A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.

In this area

12 providers in Butte County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $20.7M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 11 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 1.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3FEATHER RIVER CARE CENTER LLC
Oroville, CA, ranked 7041
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00087, ranked 87 nationally.
4CHESTER AUSTIN
Chico, CA, ranked 7637
$2.4M
  • Hours beyond a day in 16 months, but with up to 429 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4CHUKWUEMEKA NDULUE
Gridley, CA, ranked 7639
$2.3M
  • Hours beyond a day in 33 months, but with up to 2228 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4HEATHER O'CONNELL
Chico, CA, ranked 7810
$1.1M
  • Hours beyond a day in 5 months, but with up to 124 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4JOE TAYLOR
Chico, CA, ranked 8117
$2.7M
  • Hours beyond a day in 15 months, but with up to 663 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4MARJORIE SHELTON-GROSS
Chico, CA, ranked 8402
$5.2M
  • Hours beyond a day in 50 months, but with up to 1211 patients a month across 9 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
4MARK HEINRICH
Oroville, CA, ranked 8432
$4.5M
  • Hours beyond a day in 76 months, but with up to 4066 patients a month across 8 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
4ALYSSA MILLIRON
Chico, CA, ranked 9761
$4K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 900 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
All 12 in CA

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.