Providers
All 70 in CA
FELIPE RUIZ, D.P.M.
NPI 1568605269, individual, Clovis, CA, Podiatrist, Foot & Ankle Surgery
1
Evidence tier
adjudicated in a public enforcement record
- Adjudicated (indicted, pleaded guilty, sentenced) per a Department of Justice release dated April 10, 2025.
- Medicaid paid $2,723 in the last 12 observed months.
score 93 of 100, rank 355, $3K at stake
Public list actions
Medicare revocation effective September 22, 2025, barred from re-enrolling until September 22, 2035
424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies, Practitioner - Podiatry, CA
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | FELIPE RUIZ, D.P.M. |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | April 9, 2009, last updated March 30, 2021 |
| Practice location | 724 MEDICAL CENTER DR E STE 102, Clovis, CA 93611-6811, 559-298-7533 |
| Specialties | Podiatrist, Foot & Ankle Surgery (213ES0103X, primary, license E4827 CA) |
In this area
70 providers in Fresno County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $17.8M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 38 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 31. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOT SLEEP INC Fresno, CA, ranked 520 | $0 |
|
| 3 | COMPASSIONATE CARE HOME HEALTH Fresno, CA, ranked 789 | $1.1M |
|
| 3 | FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER Fresno, CA, ranked 1078 | $790K |
|
| 3 | ST.MARY'S HOME HEALTH SERVICES,INC. Fresno, CA, ranked 1143 | $513K |
|
| 3 | CARELIFE HOSPICE, INC. Fresno, CA, ranked 1414 | $54K |
|
| 3 | HEALTHCARE CALIFORNIA Fresno, CA, ranked 1622 | $3K |
|
| 3 | REEDLEY SKILLED CARE LLC Reedley, CA, ranked 1971 | $0 |
|
| 3 | CALIFORNIA HOME FOR THE AGED, INC. Fresno, CA, ranked 2303 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.