Providers

AVON HEALTHCARE CENTER, INC.

NPI 1619373024, organization, Avon, OH, Skilled Nursing Facility

3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 5694, $0 at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameAVON HEALTHCARE CENTER, INC. (also THE WOODS ON FRENCH CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER)
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedNovember 12, 2014, last updated September 15, 2015
Practice location37845 COLORADO AVENUE, Avon, OH 44011, 440-695-1400
Mailing address6967 DEER TRAIL AVE NE, Canton, OH 44721-2069
Authorized officialJOE ALTIERI (President)
Specialties
Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary)

In this area

12 providers in Lorain County, OH carry an indicator in the public record, with $3.2M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 12 of them.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3SPRENGER HOSPICE, INC.
Lorain, OH, ranked 942
$3.2M
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
3KENDAL AT OBERLIN
Oberlin, OH, ranked 1972
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00122, ranked 122 nationally.
3WELLSPRING HOME HEALTH CARE, INC.
Lorain, OH, ranked 2037
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
3AMHERST MANOR, INC.
Amherst, OH, ranked 2186
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
3LAGRANGE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC.
Lagrange, OH, ranked 2225
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
3ANCHOR LODGE NURSING HOME, INC.
Lorain, OH, ranked 2721
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
3ELMS RETIREMENT VILLAGE, INC.
Wellington, OH, ranked 4024
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
3WESSELL GENERATIONS, INC.
Oberlin, OH, ranked 4228
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
All 12 in OH

Recent enforcement in OH

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJCivil settlementJun 23, 2026
Ohio Dentist Agrees to Pay $500,000 to Resolve Allegations of Submitting False Claims to Medicaid
Meckler billed the Ohio Department of Medicaid for services provided by Ball, who was excluded from the Medicaid program, by listing Meckler as the rendering provider instead of Ball.
DOJSentencedJun 15, 2026
Ohio Doctor Ordered to Pay Nearly $1M for Facilitating Fraud on Medicare
A physician working as an independent contractor for a telemedicine company signed doctor's orders for durable medical equipment braces and genetic testing without meaningfully reviewing patient records or performing required in-person assessments, and those orders were used to bill Medicare more than $1,842,524.
DOJCivil settlementApr 2, 2026
Trinity Hospital Agrees to Pay $1.7M to Resolve Alleged Stark Law Violations
Trinity agreed to pay $1.7 million to resolve allegations that from 2014 through 2020 it made improper financial contributions to two referring physicians through office space rental arrangements that exceeded fair market value, in violation of the Stark Law.
DOJComplaint filedFeb 20, 2026
Justice Department Sues OhioHealth for Anticompetitive Healthcare Contracts That Increase Costs for Ohio Patients
The Justice Department and Ohio Attorney General filed a civil antitrust complaint alleging OhioHealth used its market power to impose contractual restrictions that prevent insurers from offering lower-cost health plans and limit access to price information.
DOJSentencedJan 14, 2026
Ohio Doctor Sentenced to Prison for $14M Healthcare Fraud Scheme
A licensed Ohio physician employed by two Florida telemedicine companies signed pre-completed orders for durable medical equipment and cancer genetic testing, falsely affirming he had examined the patients, causing more than $14.5 million in fraudulent Medicare claims.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.