Providers

TODD DAVID SPENCER, MD

NPI 1639102536, individual, Madera, CA, Specialist

1
Evidence tier
documented action, then payment
  • Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list since October 19, 2017.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 3 later months, $1,154 in total.
score 93 of 100, rank 389, $1K at stake

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
CA Medicaid exclusion list
ca medi-cal suspended & ineligible provider list (july 2026)
Exact NPI, name verifiedOct 19, 2017still open3Jan 2018Mar 2018$1K$0

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameTODD DAVID SPENCER, MD
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedJuly 7, 2006, last updated July 22, 2016
Practice location1250 E ALMOND AVE, Madera, CA 93637-5606, 559-675-9281
Mailing addressPO BOX 1139, Bakersfield, CA 93302-1139
Specialties
Specialist (174400000X, primary, license G702730 CA)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
76700Complete ultrasound scan of abdomen$67458%$8.32$44 (top 5% from $152)too few months to rank
71020Medicaid service code$23620%$18$13 (top 5% from $21)too few months to rank
76856Complete ultrasound scan of pelvis$18316%$2.23$37 (top 5% from $154)too few months to rank
76830Ultrasound scan of uterus, ovaries, tubes, cervix and pelvic area through vagina$615%$0.90$54 (top 5% from $126)too few months to rank
72148Mri scan of lower spinal canal without contrast$00%$0.00$102 (top 5% from $336)too few months to rank

In this area

12 providers in Madera County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $6.0M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 10 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 2.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3OAKHURST SKILLED CARE LLC
Oakhurst, CA, ranked 2560
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00031, ranked 31 nationally.
3PALMS CARE CENTER LLC
Chowchilla, CA, ranked 5218
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00087, ranked 87 nationally.
4QIU ZHONG
Madera, CA, ranked 7890
$733K
  • Hours beyond a day in 8 months, but with up to 78 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4ESEQUIEL RODRIGUEZ
Madera, CA, ranked 7955
$445K
  • Hours beyond a day in 2 months, but with up to 132 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4MARK ROWE
Madera, CA, ranked 8003
$275K
  • Hours beyond a day in 4 months, but with up to 109 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4NAEEM SIDDIQI
Madera, CA, ranked 8576
$2.9M
  • Hours beyond a day in 12 months, but with up to 1487 patients a month across 5 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
4ROSALBA SERRANO RIVERA
Madera, CA, ranked 9103
$694K
  • Hours beyond a day in 18 months, but with up to 1426 patients a month across 6 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
4JORGE LOPEZ-AGUADO
Oakhurst, CA, ranked 9142
$613K
  • Hours beyond a day in 2 months, but with up to 958 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
All 12 in CA

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.