AMIR FRIEDMAN, MD
NPI 1689662041, individual, Encino, CA, Pain Medicine, Interventional Pain Medicine
- Listed on the Medicare revocation list since October 21, 2019.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 13 later months, $181 in total.
Public list actions
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare revocation list 424.535(a)(4) false or misleading information and 424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies | Exact NPI, name verified | Oct 21, 2019 | Oct 21, 2029 | 13 | Oct 2020 | Nov 2021 | $181 | $0 |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | AMIR FRIEDMAN, MD |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | October 11, 2005, last updated November 4, 2009 |
| Practice location | 16055 VENTURA BLVD, Encino, CA 91436-2601, 310-251-3617 |
| Specialties | Anesthesiology (207L00000X, license A64093 CA) Pain Medicine, Interventional Pain Medicine (208VP0014X, primary, license A64093 CA) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $101 | 56% | $0.13 | $44 (top 5% from $110) | 3rd percentile | |
| 99214 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $80 | 44% | $0.19 | $60 (top 5% from $133) | 2nd percentile | |
| G0104 | Colorectal cancer screening; flexible sigmoidoscopy | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | too few months to rank | ||
| 99212 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | $28 (top 5% from $147) | too few months to rank | |
| 96127 | Assessment of emotional or behavioral problems | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | $4.12 (top 5% from $19) | too few months to rank | |
| G0328 | Colorectal cancer screening; fecal occult blood test, immunoassay, 1-3 simultaneous | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | $1.32 (top 5% from $17) | too few months to rank | |
| G0444 | Annual depression screening, 5 to 15 minutes | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | $1.46 (top 5% from $16) | too few months to rank | |
| G0121 | Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy on individual not meeting criteria for high risk | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | $373 (top 5% from $909) | too few months to rank |
In this area
399 providers in Los Angeles County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $129.6M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 347 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 36. 52 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BURBANK PREFERRED PROVIDER MEDICAL GROUP, INC Burbank, CA, ranked 17 | $67K |
|
| 1 | GOLDEN STAR LABS LLC Los Angeles, CA, ranked 32 | $41.0M |
|
| 1 | MATIAS CLINICAL LABORATORY INC Baldwin Park, CA, ranked 43 | $3.8M |
|
| 1 | HEALTHSMART PACIFIC INC Long Beach, CA, ranked 52 | $1.6M |
|
| 1 | LINDA WARREN-WATSON Lancaster, CA, ranked 71 | $828K |
|
| 1 | SOHRAB MOSHIRI Woodland Hills, CA, ranked 82 | $483K |
|
| 1 | QUALITY FAMILY HOSPICE CARE INC Tarzana, CA, ranked 92 | $375K |
|
| 1 | MARATHON HOSPICE CARE INC. North Hollywood, CA, ranked 95 | $368K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.