Providers

LABORATORY RX, LLC

NPI 1689923989, organization, Frederick, MD, Clinical Medical Laboratory

1
Evidence tier
documented action, then payment
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since November 19, 2021.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 8 later months, $131,826 in total.
score 95 of 100, rank 131, $132K at stake

Public list actions

Medicare revocation effective November 19, 2021, barred from re-enrolling until November 19, 2031
424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies, Part B Supplier - Independent Clinical Laboratory, MD

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
Medicare revocation list
424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies
Exact NPI, name verifiedNov 19, 2021Nov 19, 20318Dec 2021Jul 2022$132K$167K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameLABORATORY RX, LLC
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedAugust 31, 2012, last updated July 29, 2022
Practice location92 THOMAS JOHNSON DR STE 205, Frederick, MD 21702-4403, 240-815-5449
Mailing address217 E CHURCHVILLE RD, Bel Air, MD 21014-3825
Authorized officialAura Ionita (Practice Administrator)
Specialties
Pathology, Clinical Pathology/Laboratory Medicine (207ZP0105X)
Clinical Medical Laboratory (291U00000X, primary)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
G0481Drug test(s), definitive, utilizing (1) drug identification methods able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers (but not necessarily stereoisomers), including, but not limited to gc/ms (any type, single or tandem) and lc/ms$367K100%$131$98 (top 5% from $199)75th percentile
G0483Drug test(s), definitive, utilizing (1) drug identification methods able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers (but not necessarily stereoisomers), including, but not limited to gc/ms (any type, single or tandem) and lc/ms$2150%$7.42$146 (top 5% from $318)too few months to rank
G0482Drug test(s), definitive, utilizing (1) drug identification methods able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers (but not necessarily stereoisomers), including, but not limited to gc/ms (any type, single or tandem) and lc/ms$00%$0.00$133 (top 5% from $245)too few months to rank

In this area

3 providers in Frederick County, MD carry an indicator in the public record, with $6.1M at stake between them. The most common is paid after a public list action, on 1 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1ADAM MEDICAL EQUIPMENT INC
Frederick, MD, ranked 168
$66K
  • Listed on the MI Medicaid exclusion list and the MD Medicaid exclusion list and the SC Medicaid exclusion list and the Medicare revocation list since December 13, 2023.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 11 later months, $66,391 in total.
3HOMEWOOD LIVING FREDERICK, INC.
Frederick, MD, ranked 5270
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00122, ranked 122 nationally.
4JULIO MENOCAL
Frederick, MD, ranked 8371
$6.0M
  • Hours beyond a day in 6 months, but with up to 1349 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.

Recent enforcement in MD

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJCivil settlementMar 20, 2026
Health Care Management Corporation Agrees to Pay $4 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations
CVR knowingly submitted claims to Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE for sclerotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, and endovenous laser ablation procedures to treat chronic venous insufficiency that were not clinically indicated and were medically unnecessary between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016.
DOJCivil settlementNov 20, 2025
Diagnostic Laboratory Agrees to Pay More Than $1 Million to Settle Alleged False Claims Act Violations
GTI agreed to pay $1.635 million to resolve allegations that it submitted Medicare claims for respiratory pathogen panels that were medically unnecessary or obtained through kickbacks paid under a marketing services agreement with an infection prevention company for laboratory test referrals from long-term care facilities.
DOJSentencedNov 13, 2025
Baltimore County Woman Sentenced for Impersonating Nurses and Aggravated Identity Theft
Amponsah used stolen nursing licenses and false educational and professional histories to obtain employment as a purported licensed nurse at no less than 40 facilities in Maryland that billed health care benefit programs including Medicare and Medicaid for services she provided, earning more than $145,000 in wages.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 14, 2025
Baltimore County Woman Admits to Impersonating Nurses, Pleads Guilty to Aggravated Identity Theft
Amponsah used stolen nursing licenses and false educational and professional histories to obtain employment as a purported licensed nurse at no less than 40 facilities in Maryland, which billed health care benefit programs including Medicare and Medicaid for services she provided.
DOJCivil judgmentAug 11, 2025
United States Obtains More Than $1.4 Million Judgment Against Family Medical Practitioner for Fraudulent Billing
Akoto billed Medicare for auricular stimulation (P-Stim) devices using a code for a surgically implanted neurostimulator device, which Medicare does not reimburse as acupuncture.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.