MARK SOTTO, PT
NPI 1730661059, individual, Voorhees, NJ, Physical Therapist
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | MARK SOTTO, PT |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | September 4, 2018, last updated August 23, 2021 |
| Practice location | 2601 E EVESHAM RD, Voorhees, NJ 08043, 856-596-1113 |
| Mailing address | 22 CAMERON CIR, Laurel Springs, NJ 08021-4861 |
| Specialties | Physical Therapist (225100000X, primary, license 40QA01782400 NJ) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97110 | Therapy procedure using exercise to develop strength, endurance, range of motion, and flexibility, each 15 minutes | $139K | 83% | $85 | $76 (top 5% from $314) | 56th percentile | |
| 97161 | Evaluation for physical therapy, typically 20 minutes | $15K | 9% | $133 | $51 (top 5% from $132) | 95th percentile | |
| 97162 | Evaluation for physical therapy, typically 30 minutes | $13K | 8% | $135 | $48 (top 5% from $145) | 94th percentile | |
| 97140 | Therapy procedure using manual technique, each 15 minutes | $542 | 0% | $45 | $47 (top 5% from $120) | too few months to rank | |
| 97164 | Re-evaluation for physical therapy, typically 20 minutes | $239 | 0% | $9.21 | $36 (top 5% from $102) | too few months to rank | |
| 97010 | Medicaid service code | $166 | 0% | $0.34 | $7.53 (top 5% from $79) | 31st percentile |
| code | what it is | services | beneficiaries | paid | submitted per service | allowed per service | charge to allowed | usual for this code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97110 | Therapy procedure using exercise to develop strength, endurance, range of motion, and flexibility, each 15 minutes | 829 | 82 | $16K | $75 | $25 | 3.0x | 2.9x (90th percentile 4.8x) |
| 97161 | Evaluation for physical therapy, typically 20 minutes | 32 | 32 | $3K | $214 | $106 | 2.0x | 1.7x (90th percentile 2.9x) |
| 97164 | Re-evaluation for physical therapy, typically 20 minutes | 33 | 27 | $2K | $149 | $74 | 2.0x | 1.6x (90th percentile 2.7x) |
| 97162 | Evaluation for physical therapy, typically 30 minutes | 22 | 21 | $2K | $214 | $106 | 2.0x | 1.7x (90th percentile 2.9x) |
| 97112 | Therapy procedure to re-educate brain-to-nerve-to-muscle function, each 15 minutes | 35 | 11 | $845 | $82 | $31 | 2.7x | 2.5x (90th percentile 4.2x) |
| 97140 | Therapy procedure using manual technique, each 15 minutes | 22 | 13 | $358 | $70 | $21 | 3.4x | 3.2x (90th percentile 5.0x) |
A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.
In this area
10 providers in Camden County, NJ carry an indicator in the public record, with $2.0M at stake between them. The most common is paid after a public list action, on 4 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 3. 3 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOLDIS GERIATRICS P.C. Stratford, NJ, ranked 274 | $12K |
|
| 1 | RICHARD COSTA Berlin, NJ, ranked 338 | $4K |
|
| 1 | MICHAEL GOLDIS Stratford, NJ, ranked 353 | $3K |
|
| 3 | JEFFHOME NJ, LLC. Voorhees, NJ, ranked 2405 | $0 |
|
| 3 | HOLY REDEEMER HOSPICE INC. Runnemede, NJ, ranked 3252 | $0 |
|
| 3 | HOLY REDEEMER HOME CARE, INC. Runnemede, NJ, ranked 6701 | $0 |
|
| 4 | ISIAKA BOLARINWA Gloucester City, NJ, ranked 8791 | $1.7M |
|
| 5 | STEPHEN COHEN Camden, NJ, ranked 10359 | $251K |
|
Recent enforcement in NJ
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.