Providers

KARUNESH SINGHAL, M.D.

NPI 1811928351, individual, Edmond, OK, Emergency Medicine

1
Evidence tier
documented action, then payment
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since September 26, 2020.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 3 later months, $36,675 in total.
score 95 of 100, rank 208, $37K at stake

Public list actions

Medicare revocation effective September 26, 2020, barred from re-enrolling until September 25, 2030
424.535(a)(10) failure to document, Practitioner - Family Practice, OK

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
Medicare revocation list
424.535(a)(10) failure to document
Exact NPI, name verifiedSep 26, 2020Sep 25, 20303Jul 2021Sep 2021$37K$0

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameKARUNESH SINGHAL, M.D.
TypeIndividual, sole proprietor
StatusActive
NPI issuedJuly 5, 2006, last updated May 7, 2018
Practice location15312 GRAYSON DR, Edmond, OK 73013-2652, 405-715-0742
Specialties
Emergency Medicine (207P00000X, primary, license 22022 OK)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99212Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more$37K100%$573$28 (top 5% from $147)too few months to rank

In this area

31 providers in Oklahoma County, OK carry an indicator in the public record, with $1.1M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 16 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 8. 4 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 123
$144K
  • Adjudicated (sentenced) per a state attorney general release dated June 9, 2026.
  • Medicaid paid $144,136 in the last 12 observed months.
1MMS IMAGING SERVICES LLC
Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 241
$21K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since February 11, 2021.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 6 later months, $20,766 in total.
1FRANKLIN NWOKE
Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 315
$6K
  • Listed on the IN Medicaid exclusion list and the MD Medicaid exclusion list since May 9, 2019.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 26 later months, $5,888 in total.
1NATASHA ALLMON
Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 535
$0
  • Adjudicated (pleaded guilty, sentenced) per a Department of Justice release dated August 15, 2025.
  • No Medicaid payments in the last 12 observed months.
3ALEXANDER FRANK
Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 1346
$108K
  • Charged (indicted) per a Department of Justice release dated June 3, 2025, not adjudicated.
  • Medicaid paid $108,124 in the last 12 observed months.
  • and 3 more
3COORDINATED CARE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC
Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 1354
$103K
  • Charged (complaint) per an HHS-OIG enforcement record dated December 4, 2024, not adjudicated.
  • Medicaid paid $103,157 in the last 12 observed months.
3JUDY DENNIS
Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 1447
$38K
  • Charged (indicted) per a Department of Justice release dated June 16, 2026, not adjudicated.
  • Medicaid paid $37,964 in the last 12 observed months.
3CWM HOSPICE CARE 2, LLC
Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 2041
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00053, ranked 53 nationally.
All 31 in OK

Recent enforcement in OK

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJIndictedJun 24, 2026
NDOK Announces Charges Related to the 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Bowles, operator of three pharmacies, allegedly submitted false claims for reimbursement for COVID-19 tests to Medicare and Medicaid, and a civil forfeiture complaint alleged Dameion Ray improperly used approximately $300,000 of a $600,000 Child Care Desert Grant to purchase real property.
DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Western District of Oklahoma Cases Filed as Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Two defendants operating a durable medical equipment company were indicted for submitting fraudulent TRICARE claims for more than 650,000 in-person CPAP-related services they did not provide, and a speech-language pathologist was charged in a civil complaint with submitting more than $2.5 million in false claims to Medicare, Oklahoma Medicaid, and TRICARE for services not rendered or not medically necessary.
DOJSentencedMay 1, 2026
Oklahoma City Woman Sentenced to Federal Prison for $1.1 Million Health Care Fraud Scheme
Allmon submitted thousands of false and fraudulent claims to Blue Cross Blue Shield for behavioral health counseling sessions purportedly provided to family members, including claims of treating beneficiaries for more than 24 hours in a single day.
DOJCivil settlementJan 22, 2026
Traditions Health Agrees to Pay $34M to Resolve False Claims Act Liability Relating to Home Health Services Following Self Disclosure
Traditions submitted claims to Medicare for home health services that were not medically necessary from its McAlester, Oklahoma location and paid remuneration to physician-medical directors in Oklahoma and Texas who referred Medicare beneficiaries to it for home health services.
DOJSentencedOct 14, 2025
Compounding Pharmacy Owner Sent Back to Prison
Compounding pharmacy owner previously convicted of conspiracy to offer and pay health care kickbacks was sentenced for violating supervised release by failing to make restitution payments and concealing accounts, businesses, and asset transfers from Probation.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.