MMS IMAGING SERVICES LLC
NPI 1831417351, organization, Oklahoma City, OK, Portable X-Ray and/or Other Portable Diagnostic Imaging Supplier
- Listed on the Medicare revocation list since February 11, 2021.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 6 later months, $20,766 in total.
Public list actions
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare revocation list 424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies | Exact NPI, name verified | Feb 11, 2021 | Feb 11, 2031 | 6 | Mar 2021 | Aug 2021 | $21K | $29K |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | MMS IMAGING SERVICES LLC |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | May 7, 2010, last updated June 17, 2020 |
| Practice location | 1415 NW 43RD ST, Oklahoma City, OK 73118-5021, 806-281-0499 |
| Mailing address | 5109 82ND ST, UNIT 7, PMB 244, Lubbock, TX 79424-3000 |
| Authorized official | Nisha Wilkins (Manager) |
| Specialties | Portable X-Ray and/or Other Portable Diagnostic Imaging Supplier (335V00000X, primary, license 3712259316 OK) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0070 | Transportation of portable x-ray equipment and personnel to home or nursing home, per trip to facility or location, one patient seen | $257K | 82% | $82 | $18 (top 5% from $107) | 90th percentile | |
| Q0092 | Set-up portable x-ray equipment | $31K | 10% | $8.90 | $2.79 (top 5% from $15) | 86th percentile | |
| 71045 | X-ray of chest, 1 view | $12K | 4% | $6.35 | $5.95 (top 5% from $56) | 55th percentile | |
| R0075 | Transportation of portable x-ray equipment and personnel to home or nursing home, per trip to facility or location, more than one patient seen | $7K | 2% | $24 | $8.59 (top 5% from $91) | 71st percentile | |
| 71046 | X-ray of chest, 2 views | $2K | 1% | $8.17 | $8.15 (top 5% from $65) | 50th percentile | |
| 73502 | X-ray of hip, 2-3 views | $2K | 1% | $10 | $9.45 (top 5% from $52) | 54th percentile | |
| 73560 | X-ray of knee, 1-2 views | $1K | 0% | $8.81 | $9.30 (top 5% from $49) | 48th percentile | |
| 93000 | Routine electrocardiogram (ecg) using at least 12 leads with interpretation and report | $878 | 0% | $5.17 | $11 (top 5% from $25) | 12th percentile |
In this area
31 providers in Oklahoma County, OK carry an indicator in the public record, with $1.1M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 16 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 8. 4 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL SOLUTIONS, LLC Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 123 | $144K |
|
| 1 | KARUNESH SINGHAL Edmond, OK, ranked 208 | $37K |
|
| 1 | FRANKLIN NWOKE Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 315 | $6K |
|
| 1 | NATASHA ALLMON Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 535 | $0 |
|
| 3 | ALEXANDER FRANK Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 1346 | $108K |
|
| 3 | COORDINATED CARE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 1354 | $103K |
|
| 3 | JUDY DENNIS Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 1447 | $38K |
|
| 3 | CWM HOSPICE CARE 2, LLC Oklahoma City, OK, ranked 2041 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in OK
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.