Providers

ADVANTAGE HOSPICE COMPANY

NPI 1861066995, organization, Canton, OH, Hospice Care, Community Based

3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
  • Part of provider network D1-00124, ranked 124 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 6228, $0 at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameADVANTAGE HOSPICE COMPANY
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedMay 13, 2021, last updated March 16, 2022
Practice location4141 FULTON DR NW, Canton, OH 44718-2819, 234-262-9650
Authorized officialSTEVE NAM (President Chief Executive Officer)
Specialties
Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary)

In this area

9 providers in Stark County, OH carry an indicator in the public record, with $249K at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 6 of them, followed by named in an enforcement record on 2.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3MERCY MEDICAL CENTER HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE LLC
Canton, OH, ranked 1422
$51K
  • Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
3MERCY MEDICAL CENTER HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE LLC
Canton, OH, ranked 1594
$5K
  • Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
3CANTON REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER LLC
Canton, OH, ranked 1844
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00087, ranked 87 nationally.
3ASHLEY VERNON
Canton, OH, ranked 3087
$0
  • Charged (indicted) per a state attorney general release dated March 12, 2026, not adjudicated.
3ROSE LANE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION INC.
Massillon, OH, ranked 3978
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
3MCKINLEY NURSING
Canton, OH, ranked 4452
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00124, ranked 124 nationally.
3ROSELAWN GARDENS HEALTHCARE LLC
Alliance, OH, ranked 6510
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00083, ranked 83 nationally.
3TOYA HALE
Canton, OH, ranked 7254
$0
  • Charged (indicted) per a state attorney general release dated August 15, 2025, not adjudicated.
All 9 in OH

Recent enforcement in OH

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJCivil settlementJun 23, 2026
Ohio Dentist Agrees to Pay $500,000 to Resolve Allegations of Submitting False Claims to Medicaid
Meckler billed the Ohio Department of Medicaid for services provided by Ball, who was excluded from the Medicaid program, by listing Meckler as the rendering provider instead of Ball.
DOJSentencedJun 15, 2026
Ohio Doctor Ordered to Pay Nearly $1M for Facilitating Fraud on Medicare
A physician working as an independent contractor for a telemedicine company signed doctor's orders for durable medical equipment braces and genetic testing without meaningfully reviewing patient records or performing required in-person assessments, and those orders were used to bill Medicare more than $1,842,524.
DOJCivil settlementApr 2, 2026
Trinity Hospital Agrees to Pay $1.7M to Resolve Alleged Stark Law Violations
Trinity agreed to pay $1.7 million to resolve allegations that from 2014 through 2020 it made improper financial contributions to two referring physicians through office space rental arrangements that exceeded fair market value, in violation of the Stark Law.
DOJComplaint filedFeb 20, 2026
Justice Department Sues OhioHealth for Anticompetitive Healthcare Contracts That Increase Costs for Ohio Patients
The Justice Department and Ohio Attorney General filed a civil antitrust complaint alleging OhioHealth used its market power to impose contractual restrictions that prevent insurers from offering lower-cost health plans and limit access to price information.
DOJSentencedJan 14, 2026
Ohio Doctor Sentenced to Prison for $14M Healthcare Fraud Scheme
A licensed Ohio physician employed by two Florida telemedicine companies signed pre-completed orders for durable medical equipment and cancer genetic testing, falsely affirming he had examined the patients, causing more than $14.5 million in fraudulent Medicare claims.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.