Providers
All 15 in AZ
FAMILY CARE HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE
NPI 1871016675, organization, Bullhead City, AZ, Hospice Care, Community Based
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00128, ranked 128 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 6163, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00128 ranked 12838 providers around Bullhead City, AZ: 16 hospices, 17 home health agencies, 5 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | FAMILY CARE HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE (also FAMILY CARE HOSPICE) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | July 24, 2017, last updated May 26, 2024 |
| Practice location | 2440 ADOBE RD, STE 107, Bullhead City, AZ 86442-4485, 928-299-5100 |
| Authorized official | MOHAMMED AHMED (Manager) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X) Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary, license HSPC8446 AZ) |
In this area
15 providers in Mohave County, AZ carry an indicator in the public record, with $8.9M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 8 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 5. 3 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MICHAEL SHING Bullhead City, AZ, ranked 242 | $21K |
|
| 1 | DONOVAN ANDERSON Mohave Valley, AZ, ranked 351 | $3K |
|
| 1 | JENNIFER MACDONALD Lake Havasu City, AZ, ranked 368 | $2K |
|
| 3 | ARIZONA IN-HOME PARTNER-II, LLC Bullhead City, AZ, ranked 2306 | $0 |
|
| 3 | ST THERESA HOSPICE LLC Bullhead City, AZ, ranked 3122 | $0 |
|
| 3 | V A HOME HEALTH 2 INC Bullhead City, AZ, ranked 3692 | $0 |
|
| 3 | BILLET HOSPICE INC - BULLHEAD CITY Bullhead City, AZ, ranked 5375 | $0 |
|
| 3 | FAMILY CARE HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE Bullhead City, AZ, ranked 5794 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in AZ
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
District of Arizona Announces Charges Involving Over $1.2 Billion in False or Fraudulent Claims as Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Four defendants were charged in connection with alleged schemes involving over $1.2 billion in false or fraudulent claims for amniotic wound allografts procured through kickbacks and for substance abuse treatment services billed to Arizona Medicaid that were not provided as billed.
DOJSentencedJun 4, 2026
New River Couple Sentenced for $12 Million AHCCCS Fraud Scheme
The Currys submitted a fraudulent AHCCCS provider enrollment application concealing Thvoughn Curry's ownership role and then billed AHCCCS through 1 Family Clinic, LLC for behavioral health and substance abuse therapy services that were not provided, receiving more than $12 million.
DOJCivil settlementMar 12, 2026
Arizona Cardiology Group to Pay $4.75M to Resolve Allegations of Unnecessary Vein Ablations
Tri-City Cardiology and three physicians allegedly violated the False Claims Act by performing medically unnecessary ablations on perforator veins and incorrectly measuring or documenting blood flow duration, vein diameter, patient symptoms, and conservative therapy measures to make the procedures appear justified.
DOJConvictedFeb 27, 2026
New River Couple Convicted of $12 Million AHCCCS Fraud Scheme
The Currys submitted a fraudulent AHCCCS provider enrollment application concealing Thvoughn Curry's ownership and then billed AHCCCS for behavioral health services that were not actually provided through 1 Family Clinic, LLC, receiving more than $12 million.
DOJSentencedFeb 27, 2026
Mesa Residents Sentenced to Prison for Fraud Targeting AHCCCS
Riley and Gooch, through their behavioral health clinic New Horizons Behavioral Health, exploited AHCCCS's American Indian Health Program between 2020 and 2022 by falsely billing for services that were not provided, obtaining approximately $3.3 million.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.