Providers

THOMAS A LAUDERMAN, DO

NPI 1891713582, individual, Salem, WV, Family Medicine

5
Evidence tier
informational
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 99406 ($112 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
score 35 of 100, rank 10200, $656K at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameTHOMAS A LAUDERMAN, DO
TypeIndividual, sole proprietor
StatusActive
NPI issuedJuly 18, 2006, last updated November 12, 2013
Practice location255 SUNBRIDGE DR, Salem, WV 26426-8400, 304-782-3000
Specialties
Family Medicine (207Q00000X, primary, license 1433 WV)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$488K44%$112$44 (top 5% from $110)95th percentile
99406Smoking and tobacco use intensive counseling, 4-10 minutes$185K17%$62$7.24 (top 5% from $18)99th percentile
80307Testing for presence of drug, by chemistry analyzers$156K14%$69$45 (top 5% from $110)79th percentile
99401Preventive counseling individual 15 min$91K8%$70$16 (top 5% from $46)98th percentile
99212Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more$84K8%$58$28 (top 5% from $147)84th percentile
90853Group psychotherapyhistory of abuse$73K7%$54$60 (top 5% from $332)45th percentile
80305Testing for presence of drug, read by direct observation$23K2%$31$9.23 (top 5% from $22)97th percentile
84703Gonadotropin (reproductive hormone) analysis$8K1%$23$3.20 (top 5% from $16)96th percentile

In this area

47 providers in WV carry an indicator in the public record, with $21.9M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 33 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 6. 6 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1JOSEPH JURAND
Martinsburg, WV, ranked 194
$48K
  • Listed on the MD Medicaid exclusion list since September 11, 2015.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 8 later months, $47,640 in total.
1MICHAEL SHRAMOWIAT LLC
Vienna, WV, ranked 202
$43K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since November 19, 2014.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 21 later months, $42,976 in total.
1SHAWN BLANKENSHIP
Charleston, WV, ranked 289
$0
  • Adjudicated (pleaded guilty) per a state attorney general release dated March 20, 2025.
  • No Medicaid payments in the last 12 observed months.
  • and 4 more
1HUGH SMITH
Charleston, WV, ranked 314
$6K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since January 7, 2021.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 5 later months, $6,083 in total.
1WILLIAM EARLEY
Vienna, WV, ranked 428
$265
  • Listed on the SC Medicaid exclusion list since May 1, 2018.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 1 later month, $265 in total.
1HOLISTIC, INC
Charleston, WV, ranked 557
$0
  • Adjudicated (pleaded guilty) per a state attorney general release dated March 20, 2025.
  • No Medicaid payments in the last 12 observed months.
3BRIAN MCDEVITT
Chapmanville, WV, ranked 1665
$915
  • Charged (indicted) per a Department of Justice release dated June 27, 2024, not adjudicated.
  • Medicaid paid $915 in the last 12 observed months.
3HARRELL NURSING HOME
Charleston, WV, ranked 2693
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
All 47 in WV

Recent enforcement in WV

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJCivil settlementJun 23, 2026
Northern District of West Virginia Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown Resulting in 455 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $6.5 Billion in Alleged Fraud
Two providers reached civil settlements resolving allegations that they used pre-signed, invalid prescriptions issued outside the usual course of their professional practice to patients in West Virginia while traveling and not in close proximity to their offices, and in one case submitted claims to Medicare and Medicaid during that time.
DOJComplaint filedJun 23, 2026
U.S. Attorney Moore Capito Announces Fraud Conspiracy Charges Against Sober Living Home Founder and Spouse
Two individuals affiliated with a sober living recovery program allegedly conspired to falsify and submit timesheets to a testing laboratory for drug testing work not performed, and the laboratory paid the billings and obtained reimbursement from federal and state healthcare programs; separately, a sleep laboratory paid $120,000 to resolve allegations it billed Medicaid and the VA Community Health program for sleep studies and polysomnogram reports prepared and signed by unqualified, non-physician staff.
DOJPleaded guiltyJun 17, 2026
Mercer County Woman Pleads Guilty to $175,731.31 Fraud Scheme Targeting Federal Veterans Health Care Benefits
Radford, an owner of Healthcare Therapy Services LLC doing business as Medical Massage Therapy, submitted false bills to CHAMPVA for massage services not rendered, stealing $175,731.31.
DOJCivil settlementMar 5, 2026
Laboratory Agrees to Pay More than $200,000 for Improper Billing to West Virginia Medicaid Program
Integra repeatedly submitted billings to the West Virginia Medicaid program for medically unnecessary testing ordered by medical providers over a two-year period, specifically improper claims for specimen validity testing that were not allowable.
DOJCivil settlementApr 2, 2025
Beckley Medical Clinic and Physician Agree to Pay $152,382.70 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations
Med-Surg and its owner submitted claims to Medicare and Medicaid using HCPCS code Q3014 for the telehealth originating site facility fee for telehealth visits where the patient was at home, which is not payable.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.