Providers
All 11 in OR
ACCENTCARE HOME HEALTH OF ROGUE VALLEY, LLC
NPI 1912228727, organization, Medford, OR, Home Health
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00205 ranked 205161 providers around Sugar Land, TX: 57 hospices, 102 home health agencies, 2 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | ACCENTCARE HOME HEALTH OF ROGUE VALLEY, LLC (also ACHH ROGUE VALLEY, LLC) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | June 15, 2010, last updated November 12, 2025 |
| Practice location | 1501 E MCANDREWS RD STE 201, Medford, OR 97504-5533, 541-414-1800 |
| Mailing address | 17855 DALLAS PKWY STE 200, Dallas, TX 75287-6857 |
| Authorized official | Dena Scwartz-Doty (VP/Secretary) |
| Specialties | Home Health (251E00000X, primary, license 131505 OR) |
In this area
11 providers in Medford, OR carry an indicator in the public record, with $5.8M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 6 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 3. 5 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JENNIFER JABLIN Portland, OR, ranked 102 | $264K |
|
| 1 | COASTAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTING GROUP INC Coos Bay, OR, ranked 125 | $141K |
|
| 1 | GARY YOUNG Eugene, OR, ranked 362 | $2K |
|
| 1 | JERRY CRUM Hermiston, OR, ranked 429 | $252 |
|
| 1 | DARLA BYUS Prineville, OR, ranked 581 | $0 |
|
| 3 | AIDEN HEALTHCARE LLC Portland, OR, ranked 935 | $3.8M |
|
| 3 | AGAPE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE NW, LLC Portland, OR, ranked 999 | $1.5M |
|
| 3 | WESTERN HEALTH RESOURCES Portland, OR, ranked 1454 | $34K |
|
Recent enforcement in OR
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Two Charged in the District of Oregon as Part of the National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Two defendants were charged with health care fraud for submitting claims for genetic testing that was never provided to Medicare Advantage plans and for sleep tests billed as conducted in office when they were done at home or not at all.
DOJComplaint filedMar 24, 2026
Pakistani National Residing in Southern California Charged with Fraudulently Billing Medicare Plans
The owner of Oregon Clinical Laboratory allegedly participated in a scheme to fraudulently bill Medicare Advantage insurance plans for laboratory testing services never performed, submitting more than $46 million in claims.
DOJIndictedJan 26, 2026
Oregon Mother and Daughter Facing New Charges Related to Forced Labor and Health Care Fraud
A superseding indictment alleges the owners of an adult foster care home coerced the labor of three victims for little or no pay while requesting and receiving Medicaid and ODHS "exceptional payments" for additional paid employee hours, lying about the victims' residence in the home, and falsifying a disability claim so one defendant could be paid hourly as a Homecare Worker.
DOJIndictedJan 26, 2026
Oregon Mother and Daughter Facing New Charges Related to Forced Labor and Health Care Fraud
A superseding indictment alleges the owners of an adult foster care home coerced the labor of three victims for little or no pay while requesting and receiving Medicaid and Oregon Department of Human Services "exceptional payments" for additional employee hours, lying about the victims' residence in the home, and falsifying a disability claim so one defendant could be paid hourly as a Homecare Worker.
DOJCivil settlementJul 1, 2025
U.S. Attorney’s Office Participates in National Health Care Fraud Takedown Resulting in $2 Million Civil Settlement
Riverpark allegedly billed Medicare and Oregon Medicaid for grossly substandard nursing home services when staffing levels did not meet minimum staffing requirements, resulting in residents experiencing increased instances and severity of preventable urinary tract infections, pressure sores, and falls.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.