ANJANA S SURA, M.D.
NPI 1972530418, individual, Montebello, CA, Specialist
- Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list since January 4, 2024.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 4 later months, $10,034 in total.
Public list actions
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA Medicaid exclusion list ca medi-cal suspended & ineligible provider list (july 2026) | Exact NPI, name verified | Jan 4, 2024 | still open | 4 | Feb 2024 | May 2024 | $10K | $5K |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | ANJANA S SURA, M.D. |
| Type | Individual, sole proprietor |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | June 28, 2006, last updated November 29, 2011 |
| Practice location | 1336 W WHITTIER BLVD, Montebello, CA 90640-4601, 323-726-2255 |
| Mailing address | 714 HAMPTON RD, Arcadia, CA 91006-2003 |
| Specialties | Specialist (174400000X, primary, license a30390 CA) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $26K | 37% | $7.58 | $44 (top 5% from $110) | 10th percentile | |
| 99212 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more | $9K | 13% | $4.56 | $28 (top 5% from $147) | 18th percentile | |
| 96156 | Assessment of health behavior | $3K | 4% | $8.67 | $8.60 (top 5% from $132) | 50th percentile | |
| 97803 | Therapy procedure reassessment for nutrition management, each 15 minutes | $3K | 4% | $11 | $22 (top 5% from $130) | 39th percentile | |
| 99203 | New patient office or other outpatient visit with low level of medical decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $3K | 4% | $32 | $67 (top 5% from $121) | too few months to rank | |
| 92552 | Test for hearing various pitches using earphone | $2K | 3% | $3.66 | $12 (top 5% from $31) | 29th percentile | |
| 99394 | Medicaid service code | $2K | 3% | $17 | $83 (top 5% from $128) | 17th percentile | |
| 99384 | Medicaid service code | $2K | 3% | $42 | $82 (top 5% from $155) | too few months to rank |
In this area
399 providers in Los Angeles County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $129.6M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 347 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 36. 52 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BURBANK PREFERRED PROVIDER MEDICAL GROUP, INC Burbank, CA, ranked 17 | $67K |
|
| 1 | GOLDEN STAR LABS LLC Los Angeles, CA, ranked 32 | $41.0M |
|
| 1 | MATIAS CLINICAL LABORATORY INC Baldwin Park, CA, ranked 43 | $3.8M |
|
| 1 | HEALTHSMART PACIFIC INC Long Beach, CA, ranked 52 | $1.6M |
|
| 1 | LINDA WARREN-WATSON Lancaster, CA, ranked 71 | $828K |
|
| 1 | SOHRAB MOSHIRI Woodland Hills, CA, ranked 82 | $483K |
|
| 1 | QUALITY FAMILY HOSPICE CARE INC Tarzana, CA, ranked 92 | $375K |
|
| 1 | MARATHON HOSPICE CARE INC. North Hollywood, CA, ranked 95 | $368K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.