Providers
All 16 in CA
SOJOURN HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE - REDDING, LLC.
NPI 1972918753, organization, Redding, CA, Hospice Care, Community Based
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00039, ranked 39 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 3041, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00039 ranked 3968 providers around Las Vegas, NV: 28 hospices, 38 home health agencies, 2 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | SOJOURN HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE - REDDING, LLC. (also BRISTOL HOSPICE-REDDING) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | June 30, 2014, last updated February 23, 2026 |
| Practice location | 415 KNOLLCREST DR STE 140B&C, Redding, CA 96002-0129, 855-472-3892 |
| Mailing address | 206 N 2100 W STE 202, Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4741 |
| Authorized official | Alex Mauricio (Ceo) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary) |
In this area
16 providers in Shasta County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $10.1M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 12 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 3. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MARK RAMUS Redding, CA, ranked 107 | $244K |
|
| 3 | NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REHABILITATION HOSPITAL, LLC Redding, CA, ranked 2241 | $0 |
|
| 3 | LHCG XXXVIII, LLC Redding, CA, ranked 3156 | $0 |
|
| 3 | DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Redding, CA, ranked 4220 | $0 |
|
| 4 | ORNELLA ADDONIZIO Redding, CA, ranked 7725 | $1.7M |
|
| 4 | BRIAN BAAS Anderson, CA, ranked 7755 | $1.4M |
|
| 4 | CHRISTOPHER WILLS Redding, CA, ranked 8658 | $2.4M |
|
| 4 | NIRMEET RAI Redding, CA, ranked 9780 | $413 |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.