Providers

NIRMEET RAI, M.D.

NPI 1982087789, individual, Redding, CA, Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program

4
Evidence tier
structure or single-organization volume
  • Hours beyond a day in 2 months, but with up to 1923 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
score 48 of 100, rank 9780, $413 at stake

Hours billed per day

Medicaid billing converted into hours of hands-on care per day. The lower bound counts one unit per claim line and needs no price; the other two divide dollars by a unit price, the conservative one at 1.5 times the price. The clinician on the claim may be a supervisor under state rules, so billing organizations are counted too.

monthwhat was foundhours per day, lower boundhours per day, at pricehours per day, conservativeper working daypatientsbilling organizationscodespaid
Dec 2020More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line33.70.20.10.21923299213$214
Aug 2021More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line29.30.20.10.21658299213$199

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameNIRMEET RAI, M.D.
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedJune 30, 2015, last updated June 30, 2015
Practice location2480 SONOMA ST, Redding, CA 96001-3027, 530-225-7800
Specialties
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program (390200000X, primary, license 39020000 CA)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
T1015Medicaid service code$6.2M99%$167$182 (top 5% from $488)43rd percentile
G0467Federally qualified health center (fqhc) visit, established patient; a medically-necessary, face-to-face encounter (one-on-one) between an established patient and a fqhc practitioner during which time one or more fqhc services are rendered and includes a t$38K1%$47$20 (top 5% from $124)83rd percentile
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$3K0%$0.05$44 (top 5% from $110)2nd percentile
99212Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more$1070%$0.06$28 (top 5% from $147)6th percentile
G9920Medicaid service code$290%$0.16$0.17 (top 5% from $29)too few months to rank
81003Automated urinalysis test$20%$0.00$1.54 (top 5% from $4.70)6th percentile
87426Detection test by immunoassay technique for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus$00%$0.00$32 (top 5% from $49)2nd percentile
72100X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views$00%$0.00$12 (top 5% from $55)too few months to rank

In this area

16 providers in Shasta County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $10.1M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 11 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 4. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1MARK RAMUS
Redding, CA, ranked 107
$244K
  • Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list since July 14, 2023.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 14 later months, $243,861 in total.
3NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REHABILITATION HOSPITAL, LLC
Redding, CA, ranked 2241
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00123, ranked 123 nationally.
3SOJOURN HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE - REDDING, LLC.
Redding, CA, ranked 3041
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00039, ranked 39 nationally.
3LHCG XXXVIII, LLC
Redding, CA, ranked 3156
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00121, ranked 121 nationally.
3DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Redding, CA, ranked 4220
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00138, ranked 138 nationally.
4ORNELLA ADDONIZIO
Redding, CA, ranked 7725
$1.7M
  • Hours beyond a day in 17 months under one organization, which can be supervisory billing.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4BRIAN BAAS
Anderson, CA, ranked 7755
$1.4M
  • Hours beyond a day in 5 months, but with up to 838 patients a month across 7 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4CHRISTOPHER WILLS
Redding, CA, ranked 8658
$2.4M
  • Hours beyond a day in 10 months, but with up to 1068 patients a month across 4 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
All 16 in CA

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.