RICHARD J KROOP, MD
NPI 1992735591, individual, Burbank, CA, Internal Medicine
- Listed on the Medicare revocation list since October 21, 2020.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 10 later months, $20,374 in total.
Public list actions
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare revocation list 424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies | Exact NPI, name verified | Oct 21, 2020 | Oct 21, 2030 | 10 | Mar 2022 | Dec 2022 | $20K | $0 |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | RICHARD J KROOP, MD |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | July 3, 2006, last updated July 13, 2010 |
| Practice location | 201 S BUENA VISTA ST, SUITE # 300, Burbank, CA 91505-4569, 818-567-6550 |
| Specialties | Internal Medicine (207R00000X, primary, license G36316 CA) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99308 | Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $34K | 60% | $173 | $14 (top 5% from $58) | 100th percentile | |
| 99307 | Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 10 minutes | $18K | 33% | $119 | $7.86 (top 5% from $34) | 99th percentile | |
| 99212 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more | $2K | 4% | $34 | $28 (top 5% from $147) | too few months to rank | |
| 99497 | Advance care planning, first 30 minutes | $1K | 2% | $6.45 | $11 (top 5% from $62) | 38th percentile | |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $1K | 2% | $7.41 | $44 (top 5% from $110) | 10th percentile | |
| 36415 | Insertion of needle into vein for collection of blood sample | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | $1.97 (top 5% from $12) | too few months to rank | |
| 85027 | Complete blood cell count (red cells, white blood cell, platelets), automated test | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | $4.26 (top 5% from $14) | too few months to rank | |
| 80076 | Liver function blood test panel | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | $5.29 (top 5% from $20) | too few months to rank |
In this area
399 providers in Los Angeles County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $129.6M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 347 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 36. 52 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BURBANK PREFERRED PROVIDER MEDICAL GROUP, INC Burbank, CA, ranked 17 | $67K |
|
| 1 | GOLDEN STAR LABS LLC Los Angeles, CA, ranked 32 | $41.0M |
|
| 1 | MATIAS CLINICAL LABORATORY INC Baldwin Park, CA, ranked 43 | $3.8M |
|
| 1 | HEALTHSMART PACIFIC INC Long Beach, CA, ranked 52 | $1.6M |
|
| 1 | LINDA WARREN-WATSON Lancaster, CA, ranked 71 | $828K |
|
| 1 | SOHRAB MOSHIRI Woodland Hills, CA, ranked 82 | $483K |
|
| 1 | QUALITY FAMILY HOSPICE CARE INC Tarzana, CA, ranked 92 | $375K |
|
| 1 | MARATHON HOSPICE CARE INC. North Hollywood, CA, ranked 95 | $368K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.