Providers

JEFFREY L GLASS, MD

NPI 1023120136, individual, Lufkin, TX, Pediatrics

4
Evidence tier
structure or single-organization volume
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 1964 patients a month across 7 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 87426 ($51 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
score 55 of 100, rank 7616, $2.5M at stake

Hours billed per day

Medicaid billing converted into hours of hands-on care per day. The lower bound counts one unit per claim line and needs no price; the other two divide dollars by a unit price, the conservative one at 1.5 times the price. The clinician on the claim may be a supervisor under state rules, so billing organizations are counted too.

monthwhat was foundhours per day, lower boundhours per day, at pricehours per day, conservativeper working daypatientsbilling organizationscodespaid
Dec 2023More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line27.431.420.930.91964792507 99212 99213 99214 99238$106K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameJEFFREY L GLASS, MD
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedAugust 31, 2006, last updated July 8, 2007
Practice location205 GENE SAMFORD DR, Lufkin, TX 75904, 936-634-2214
Specialties
Pediatrics (208000000X, primary, license K7289 TX)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$1.8M23%$42$44 (top 5% from $110)47th percentile
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$789K10%$58$60 (top 5% from $133)47th percentile
87426Detection test by immunoassay technique for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus$722K9%$51$32 (top 5% from $49)97th percentile
99392Medicaid service code$694K9%$87$78 (top 5% from $124)64th percentile
99391Medicaid service code$586K7%$88$76 (top 5% from $126)67th percentile
90460Administration of first vaccine or toxoid component with counseling (18 years or younger)$539K7%$29$26 (top 5% from $54)55th percentile
99393Medicaid service code$538K7%$92$78 (top 5% from $121)72nd percentile
99394Medicaid service code$371K5%$97$83 (top 5% from $128)71st percentile

In this area

4 providers in Angelina County, TX carry an indicator in the public record, with $1.9M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 2 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 2.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3PREFERRED HOME HEALTH, LP
Lufkin, TX, ranked 2243
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00053, ranked 53 nationally.
3AGAPE HOME CARE SERVICES LLC
Lufkin, TX, ranked 4793
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00050, ranked 50 nationally.
4GEORGE FIDONE
Lufkin, TX, ranked 7703
$1.9M
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 1814 patients a month across 6 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
5HANNAH MOORE
Lufkin, TX, ranked 11795
$40K

Recent enforcement in TX

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
Dallas medical clinic to pay $7.5 million to resolve COVID-19 testing overbilling allegations
Aymancare billed the federal government's HRSA Uninsured Program for separate evaluation and management services in addition to COVID-19 specimen collection and testing at pop-up testing sites when no such separate services were performed.
DOJConvictedAug 12, 2026
Scammer pharmacist guilty in $20 million healthcare kickback scheme
Thomas paid over $2 million in kickbacks to the owner of a Houston clinic in exchange for referrals of DOL-OWCP insured patients prescribed high-reimbursement compounded medications, which his pharmacy then billed to DOL-OWCP, receiving more than $20 million in reimbursements.
DOJIndictedJun 24, 2026
U.S. Attorney Announces Major Health Care Fraud Cases in Western District of Texas
Charles is alleged to have received illegal kickbacks for referring patients to San Antonio area hospice companies, causing over $9 million in Medicare claims, while Dr. Duncan settled allegations of billing Medicare and TRICARE for an unapproved amniotic-based product and Trevor's Place settled allegations of submitting inflated TRICARE claims for services not provided.
DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Nine charged in SDTX as part of national health care fraud takedown
Nine defendants were indicted in the Southern District of Texas for operating pill mill clinics and a pharmacy that unlawfully distributed controlled substances, billing Medicaid $16 million for mental health services for minors that did not occur, and billing Medicare and TRICARE approximately $906 million for medically unnecessary amniotic wound allografts procured through kickbacks.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Northern District of Texas Charges 13 Health Care Fraudsters for Loss Over $360 Million
Thirteen defendants in the Northern District of Texas were charged in seven cases involving more than $365 million in fraudulent billing to federally-funded programs and other insurers, including laboratory and genetic testing claims procured through kickbacks, transcranial magnetic stimulation treatments billed to TRICARE, medically unnecessary EEG testing, and hospice services never provided.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.