Providers
HANNAH MOORE, PMHNP-BC
NPI 1942942214, individual, Lufkin, TX, Nurse Practitioner, Psych/Mental Health
5
Evidence tier
informational
score 30 of 100, rank 11795, $40K at stake
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | HANNAH MOORE, PMHNP-BC |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | April 8, 2022, last updated March 28, 2025 |
| Practice location | 119 E SHEPHERD AVE, Lufkin, TX 75901-0315, 936-630-4771 |
| Specialties | Nurse Practitioner, Psych/Mental Health (363LP0808X, primary, license 1071724 TX) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
Medicaid, largest codes
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99308 | Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $53K | 55% | $11 | $14 (top 5% from $58) | 39th percentile | |
| 99309 | Subsequent nursing facility care with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 30 minutes | $34K | 36% | $13 | $21 (top 5% from $84) | 30th percentile | |
| 90792 | Psychiatric diagnostic evaluation with medical services | $7K | 7% | $37 | $112 (top 5% from $313) | 15th percentile | |
| CP003 | Medicaid service code | $2K | 2% | $12 | too few months to rank | ||
| 99441 | Telephone medical discussion with physician, 5-10 minutes | $185 | 0% | $2.18 | $11 (top 5% from $106) | 33rd percentile |
Medicare Part B 2024, largest codes
| code | what it is | services | beneficiaries | paid | submitted per service | allowed per service | charge to allowed | usual for this code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99308 | Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, 20 minutes or more | 2,698 | 264 | $122K | $80 | $60 | 1.3x | 2.0x (90th percentile 3.4x) |
| 99309 | Subsequent nursing facility care with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 30 minutes | 1,090 | 287 | $71K | $150 | $87 | 1.7x | 2.0x (90th percentile 3.3x) |
| 90792 | Psychiatric diagnostic evaluation with medical services | 112 | 112 | $14K | $240 | $159 | 1.5x | 2.2x (90th percentile 3.9x) |
| 99441 | Telephone medical discussion with physician, 5-10 minutes | 186 | 161 | $6K | $60 | $45 | 1.3x | 2.1x (90th percentile 3.9x) |
| 99442 | Telephone medical discussion with physician, 11-20 minutes | 43 | 42 | $3K | $80 | $74 | 1.1x | 2.1x (90th percentile 3.7x) |
A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.
In this area
4 providers in Angelina County, TX carry an indicator in the public record, with $4.4M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 2 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 2.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | PREFERRED HOME HEALTH, LP Lufkin, TX, ranked 2243 | $0 |
|
| 3 | AGAPE HOME CARE SERVICES LLC Lufkin, TX, ranked 4793 | $0 |
|
| 4 | JEFFREY GLASS Lufkin, TX, ranked 7616 | $2.5M |
|
| 4 | GEORGE FIDONE Lufkin, TX, ranked 7703 | $1.9M |
|
Recent enforcement in TX
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
Dallas medical clinic to pay $7.5 million to resolve COVID-19 testing overbilling allegations
Aymancare billed the federal government's HRSA Uninsured Program for separate evaluation and management services in addition to COVID-19 specimen collection and testing at pop-up testing sites when no such separate services were performed.
DOJConvictedAug 12, 2026
Scammer pharmacist guilty in $20 million healthcare kickback scheme
Thomas paid over $2 million in kickbacks to the owner of a Houston clinic in exchange for referrals of DOL-OWCP insured patients prescribed high-reimbursement compounded medications, which his pharmacy then billed to DOL-OWCP, receiving more than $20 million in reimbursements.
DOJIndictedJun 24, 2026
U.S. Attorney Announces Major Health Care Fraud Cases in Western District of Texas
Charles is alleged to have received illegal kickbacks for referring patients to San Antonio area hospice companies, causing over $9 million in Medicare claims, while Dr. Duncan settled allegations of billing Medicare and TRICARE for an unapproved amniotic-based product and Trevor's Place settled allegations of submitting inflated TRICARE claims for services not provided.
DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Nine charged in SDTX as part of national health care fraud takedown
Nine defendants were indicted in the Southern District of Texas for operating pill mill clinics and a pharmacy that unlawfully distributed controlled substances, billing Medicaid $16 million for mental health services for minors that did not occur, and billing Medicare and TRICARE approximately $906 million for medically unnecessary amniotic wound allografts procured through kickbacks.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Northern District of Texas Charges 13 Health Care Fraudsters for Loss Over $360 Million
Thirteen defendants in the Northern District of Texas were charged in seven cases involving more than $365 million in fraudulent billing to federally-funded programs and other insurers, including laboratory and genetic testing claims procured through kickbacks, transcranial magnetic stimulation treatments billed to TRICARE, medically unnecessary EEG testing, and hospice services never provided.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.