Providers

AGAPE HOME CARE SERVICES LLC

NPI 1043450125, organization, Lufkin, TX, Home Health

3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
  • Part of provider network D1-00050, ranked 50 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 4793, $0 at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameAGAPE HOME CARE SERVICES LLC (also RELIANT AT HOME)
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedMarch 2, 2009, last updated May 14, 2024
Practice location1502 S JOHN REDDITT DR, Lufkin, TX 75904-5454, 936-632-4273
Authorized officialCASEY WILSON (VP of Ops)
Specialties
Home Health (251E00000X, primary)

In this area

4 providers in Angelina County, TX carry an indicator in the public record, with $4.4M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 3 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 1.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3PREFERRED HOME HEALTH, LP
Lufkin, TX, ranked 2243
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00053, ranked 53 nationally.
4JEFFREY GLASS
Lufkin, TX, ranked 7616
$2.5M
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 1964 patients a month across 7 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4GEORGE FIDONE
Lufkin, TX, ranked 7703
$1.9M
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 1814 patients a month across 6 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
5HANNAH MOORE
Lufkin, TX, ranked 11795
$40K

Recent enforcement in TX

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
Dallas medical clinic to pay $7.5 million to resolve COVID-19 testing overbilling allegations
Aymancare billed the federal government's HRSA Uninsured Program for separate evaluation and management services in addition to COVID-19 specimen collection and testing at pop-up testing sites when no such separate services were performed.
DOJConvictedAug 12, 2026
Scammer pharmacist guilty in $20 million healthcare kickback scheme
Thomas paid over $2 million in kickbacks to the owner of a Houston clinic in exchange for referrals of DOL-OWCP insured patients prescribed high-reimbursement compounded medications, which his pharmacy then billed to DOL-OWCP, receiving more than $20 million in reimbursements.
DOJIndictedJun 24, 2026
U.S. Attorney Announces Major Health Care Fraud Cases in Western District of Texas
Charles is alleged to have received illegal kickbacks for referring patients to San Antonio area hospice companies, causing over $9 million in Medicare claims, while Dr. Duncan settled allegations of billing Medicare and TRICARE for an unapproved amniotic-based product and Trevor's Place settled allegations of submitting inflated TRICARE claims for services not provided.
DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Nine charged in SDTX as part of national health care fraud takedown
Nine defendants were indicted in the Southern District of Texas for operating pill mill clinics and a pharmacy that unlawfully distributed controlled substances, billing Medicaid $16 million for mental health services for minors that did not occur, and billing Medicare and TRICARE approximately $906 million for medically unnecessary amniotic wound allografts procured through kickbacks.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Northern District of Texas Charges 13 Health Care Fraudsters for Loss Over $360 Million
Thirteen defendants in the Northern District of Texas were charged in seven cases involving more than $365 million in fraudulent billing to federally-funded programs and other insurers, including laboratory and genetic testing claims procured through kickbacks, transcranial magnetic stimulation treatments billed to TRICARE, medically unnecessary EEG testing, and hospice services never provided.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.