CHRISTINA C JONES, FNP-C
NPI 1043966906, individual, Lumberton, NC, Nurse Practitioner, Family
- Hours beyond a day in 2 months, but with up to 399 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
- Records needed.
Hours billed per day
Medicaid billing converted into hours of hands-on care per day. The lower bound counts one unit per claim line and needs no price; the other two divide dollars by a unit price, the conservative one at 1.5 times the price. The clinician on the claim may be a supervisor under state rules, so billing organizations are counted too.
| month | what was found | hours per day, lower bound | hours per day, at price | hours per day, conservative | per working day | patients | billing organizations | codes | paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2023 | More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line | 27.5 | 12.1 | 8.0 | 11.3 | 310 | 1 | 99310 99344 99350 | $12K |
| Jan 2024 | More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line | 30.2 | 28.8 | 19.2 | 25.9 | 399 | 1 | 99310 99350 | $34K |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | CHRISTINA C JONES, FNP-C |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | March 1, 2022, last updated May 5, 2026 |
| Practice location | 75 LEGEND RD, Lumberton, NC 28358-9006, 910-618-5574 |
| Specialties | Nurse Practitioner (363L00000X, license 5015865 NC) Nurse Practitioner, Family (363LF0000X, primary, license 5015865 NC) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99350 | Residence visit for established patient with high level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 60 minutes | $78K | 36% | $57 | $37 (top 5% from $218) | 67th percentile | |
| 99204 | New patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, 45 minutes or more | $27K | 13% | $113 | $95 (top 5% from $171) | too few months to rank | |
| 11057 | Removal of noncancer thickened skin growth, more than 4 growths | $19K | 9% | $10 | $14 (top 5% from $49) | 37th percentile | |
| 99214 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $14K | 7% | $73 | $60 (top 5% from $133) | 64th percentile | |
| 99203 | New patient office or other outpatient visit with low level of medical decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $13K | 6% | $70 | $67 (top 5% from $121) | 55th percentile | |
| 99310 | Subsequent nursing facility care with high level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 45 minutes | $13K | 6% | $29 | $30 (top 5% from $134) | 48th percentile | |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $9K | 4% | $46 | $44 (top 5% from $110) | 53rd percentile | |
| 99344 | Residence visit for new patient with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 60 minutes | $8K | 4% | $35 | $94 (top 5% from $327) | 34th percentile |
| code | what it is | services | beneficiaries | paid | submitted per service | allowed per service | charge to allowed | usual for this code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99350 | Residence visit for established patient with high level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 60 minutes | 523 | 521 | $40K | $236 | $146 | 1.6x | 1.9x (90th percentile 3.3x) |
| 11057 | Removal of noncancer thickened skin growth, more than 4 growths | 619 | 619 | $26K | $113 | $69 | 1.6x | 1.6x (90th percentile 2.7x) |
| 11720 | Removal of fingernails or toenails, 1-5 nails | 624 | 624 | $10K | $41 | $26 | 1.6x | 1.9x (90th percentile 3.5x) |
| 99310 | Subsequent nursing facility care with high level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 45 minutes | 88 | 88 | $4K | $194 | $121 | 1.6x | 2.0x (90th percentile 3.4x) |
| 99344 | Residence visit for new patient with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 60 minutes | 45 | 45 | $3K | $183 | $112 | 1.6x | 2.1x (90th percentile 3.5x) |
| 11719 | Trimming of fingernails or toenails | 624 | 624 | $3K | $18 | $6 | 3.2x | 3.3x (90th percentile 6.3x) |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | 21 | 20 | $1K | $276 | $72 | 3.8x | 2.2x (90th percentile 3.8x) |
| 99204 | New patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, 45 minutes or more | 16 | 16 | $1K | $278 | $134 | 2.1x | 2.4x (90th percentile 3.9x) |
A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.
In this area
5 providers in Robeson County, NC carry an indicator in the public record, with $16.8M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 4 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CAROLINA FAMILY AND URGENT CARE Lumberton, NC, ranked 30 | $6K |
|
| 4 | JANA-RAE LOCKLEAR Pembroke, NC, ranked 7363 | $123K |
|
| 5 | CHARLES GRAHAM Lumberton, NC, ranked 10416 | $15.6M |
|
| 5 | RICARDO POJOL Lumberton, NC, ranked 10998 | $1.1M | |
| 5 | FELICIA BRITT Shannon, NC, ranked 11841 | $27K |
Recent enforcement in NC
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.