CAROLINA FAMILY AND URGENT CARE
NPI 1346338159, organization, Lumberton, NC, Clinic/Center, Health Services
- Listed on the Medicare revocation list since September 8, 2023.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 7 later months, $5,787 in total.
- Medicaid dollars per patient on code 80307 ($100 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
Public list actions
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare revocation list 424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies | Exact NPI, name verified | Sep 8, 2023 | Sep 8, 2033 | 7 | Oct 2023 | Apr 2024 | $6K | $87K |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | CAROLINA FAMILY AND URGENT CARE |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | October 10, 2006, last updated July 21, 2022 |
| Practice location | 4380 FAYETTEVILLE RD, Lumberton, NC 28358-2677, 910-618-0026 |
| Authorized official | SHARON HAMMONDS (insurance) |
| Specialties | Clinic/Center, Health Services (261QH0100X, primary) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99212 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more | $823K | 47% | $131 | $28 (top 5% from $147) | too few months to rank | |
| 99214 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $432K | 25% | $149 | $60 (top 5% from $133) | too few months to rank | |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $277K | 16% | $125 | $44 (top 5% from $110) | too few months to rank | |
| 80307 | Testing for presence of drug, by chemistry analyzers | $119K | 7% | $100 | $45 (top 5% from $110) | 97th percentile | |
| 99202 | New patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 15 minutes or more | $72K | 4% | $68 | $45 (top 5% from $138) | too few months to rank | |
| 80305 | Testing for presence of drug, read by direct observation | $14K | 1% | $13 | $9.23 (top 5% from $22) | too few months to rank | |
| 99407 | Smoking and tobacco use intensive counseling, more than 10 minutes | $12K | 1% | $33 | $14 (top 5% from $36) | too few months to rank | |
| 95165 | Professional service for preparation and provision of 1 or more antigens | $5K | 0% | $105 | $187 (top 5% from $1K) | too few months to rank |
In this area
5 providers in Robeson County, NC carry an indicator in the public record, with $16.8M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 5 of them.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | JANA-RAE LOCKLEAR Pembroke, NC, ranked 7363 | $123K |
|
| 4 | CHRISTINA JONES Lumberton, NC, ranked 9647 | $46K |
|
| 5 | CHARLES GRAHAM Lumberton, NC, ranked 10416 | $15.6M |
|
| 5 | RICARDO POJOL Lumberton, NC, ranked 10998 | $1.1M | |
| 5 | FELICIA BRITT Shannon, NC, ranked 11841 | $27K |
Recent enforcement in NC
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.