Providers
All 12 in SC
THI OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT CHARLESTON, LLC
NPI 1326135500, organization, Charleston, SC, Skilled Nursing Facility
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00191 ranked 191218 providers around San Antonio, TX: 21 hospices, 11 home health agencies, 186 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | THI OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT CHARLESTON, LLC (also RIVERSIDE HEALTH AND REHAB) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | October 7, 2006, last updated August 22, 2011 |
| Practice location | 2375 BAKER HOSPITAL BLVD, Charleston, SC 29405-8233, 843-744-2750 |
| Mailing address | 920 RIDGEBROOK RD, Sparks, MD 21152-9390 |
| Authorized official | JIM THOMAS (President) |
| Specialties | Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary) |
In this area
12 providers in Charleston County, SC carry an indicator in the public record, with $6.0M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 6 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 4. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KEVIN PATEL Charleston, SC, ranked 226 | $26K |
|
| 3 | ROPER ST FRANCIS ANCILLARY SERVICES Ladson, SC, ranked 804 | $328K |
|
| 3 | LUTHERAN HOMES OF SC, INC. MT Pleasant, SC, ranked 4250 | $0 |
|
| 3 | ROPER HOSPITAL INC Ladson, SC, ranked 5775 | $0 |
|
| 3 | BISHOP GADSDEN EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT COMMUNITY Charleston, SC, ranked 6977 | $0 |
|
| 4 | DARREN PERRY North Charleston, SC, ranked 7349 | $208K |
|
| 4 | AMANDA ACREE Mount Pleasant, SC, ranked 7728 | $1.7M |
|
| 4 | SHIRLEY FORD N Charleston, SC, ranked 8745 | $1.9M |
|
Recent enforcement in SC
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJIndictedMar 11, 2026
Former Greenville CEO, Employees Indicted in Multi-Million Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme
The defendants submitted false claims to health care benefit programs for individual COVID-19 tests that had actually been pooled for combined processing and manipulated test processing software, billing for tests that were virtually worthless and ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJSentencedFeb 25, 2026
Lancaster Trio Sentenced for Health Care Fraud Conspiracy
An excluded Medicaid provider and his wife established Transformation Services in her name to bill Medicaid for behavioral health services that were overlapping, not rendered individually, and provided by unlicensed therapists, defrauding Medicaid of nearly $250,000.
DOJIndictedNov 18, 2025
Florida Man Indicted for Health Care Fraud, Wire Fraud in Durable Medical Equipment Scheme
Weinberger, who was excluded from Medicare, allegedly concealed his ownership and control of a Medicare-enrolled durable medical equipment company through a false enrollment document and, with coconspirators, used call centers to generate doctors' orders for orthotic braces and submit approximately $6.7 million in false and fraudulent claims obtained through kickbacks and bribes, medically unnecessary, or otherwise ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJCivil judgmentJul 17, 2025
United States and the States of Georgia, Colorado, and South Carolina Obtain $114.5M in Judgments in a Sprawling Cancer Genetic Testing Lab Scheme
Premier Medical, its owner and compliance vice president paid kickbacks to Freedom Medical Labs and its marketers, who collected DNA samples from Medicaid beneficiaries in public spaces and purchased telemedicine physician orders, to bill Medicaid for medically unnecessary cancer genetic testing.
DOJIndictedJun 30, 2025
S.C. Cases Among Hundreds Announced in National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Two defendants were charged with submitting false claims to Medicare and Medicaid for durable medical equipment that was not delivered or authorized, and with billing the Veterans Administration for massage therapy services not rendered.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.