Providers
All 13 in CA
CHICO HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP
NPI 1336551639, organization, Chico, CA, Skilled Nursing Facility
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00198 ranked 198138 providers around Los Angeles, CA: 18 hospices, 17 home health agencies, 103 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | CHICO HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP (also OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | May 21, 2014, last updated June 29, 2026 |
| Practice location | 375 COHASSET RD, Chico, CA 95926-2211, 530-343-5595 |
| Mailing address | 3580 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 600, Los Angeles, CA 90010-2502 |
| Authorized official | SHLOMO RECHNITZ (Managing Member) |
| Specialties | Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary) |
In this area
13 providers in Butte County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $22.1M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 12 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 1.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | FEATHER RIVER CARE CENTER LLC Oroville, CA, ranked 7041 | $0 |
|
| 4 | CHESTER AUSTIN Chico, CA, ranked 7637 | $2.4M |
|
| 4 | CHUKWUEMEKA NDULUE Gridley, CA, ranked 7639 | $2.3M |
|
| 4 | HEATHER O'CONNELL Chico, CA, ranked 7810 | $1.1M |
|
| 4 | JOE TAYLOR Chico, CA, ranked 8117 | $2.7M |
|
| 4 | MARJORIE SHELTON-GROSS Chico, CA, ranked 8402 | $5.2M |
|
| 4 | MARK HEINRICH Oroville, CA, ranked 8432 | $4.5M |
|
| 4 | NARINDER SINGH Oroville, CA, ranked 8846 | $1.4M |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.