Providers
All 79 in SC
SPRENGER HEALTHCARE OF BLUFFTON, INC
NPI 1649764119, organization, Okatie, SC, Skilled Nursing Facility
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 6817, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00130 ranked 13068 providers around Grand Rapids, MI: 7 hospices, 10 home health agencies, 51 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | SPRENGER HEALTHCARE OF BLUFFTON, INC |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | June 19, 2018, last updated June 19, 2018 |
| Practice location | 60 OKATIE VILLAGE DRIVE, Okatie, SC 29909, 440-989-5235 |
| Mailing address | 3905 OBERLIN AVE, Lorain, OH 44053-2853 |
| Authorized official | KENNETH MALANOWSKI (President) |
| Specialties | Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary) |
In this area
79 providers in SC carry an indicator in the public record, with $46.1M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 38 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 32. 4 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TRANSFORMATION SERVICES Lancaster, SC, ranked 203 | $41K |
|
| 1 | ACHIEVE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PA Greenville, SC, ranked 224 | $27K |
|
| 1 | KEVIN PATEL Charleston, SC, ranked 226 | $26K |
|
| 1 | PREMIER MEDICAL, INC. Greenville, SC, ranked 499 | $0 |
|
| 2 | RYEDENNA SIMON - MCQUEEN Florence, SC, ranked 708 | $239K |
|
| 2 | KENNETH MARTIN Columbia, SC, ranked 725 | $1.9M |
|
| 3 | ROPER ST FRANCIS ANCILLARY SERVICES Ladson, SC, ranked 804 | $328K |
|
| 3 | INSPIRIUM IHC UPSTATE, LLC Greenville, SC, ranked 1077 | $794K |
|
Recent enforcement in SC
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJIndictedMar 11, 2026
Former Greenville CEO, Employees Indicted in Multi-Million Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme
The defendants submitted false claims to health care benefit programs for individual COVID-19 tests that had actually been pooled for combined processing and manipulated test processing software, billing for tests that were virtually worthless and ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJSentencedFeb 25, 2026
Lancaster Trio Sentenced for Health Care Fraud Conspiracy
An excluded Medicaid provider and his wife established Transformation Services in her name to bill Medicaid for behavioral health services that were overlapping, not rendered individually, and provided by unlicensed therapists, defrauding Medicaid of nearly $250,000.
DOJIndictedNov 18, 2025
Florida Man Indicted for Health Care Fraud, Wire Fraud in Durable Medical Equipment Scheme
Weinberger, who was excluded from Medicare, allegedly concealed his ownership and control of a Medicare-enrolled durable medical equipment company through a false enrollment document and, with coconspirators, used call centers to generate doctors' orders for orthotic braces and submit approximately $6.7 million in false and fraudulent claims obtained through kickbacks and bribes, medically unnecessary, or otherwise ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJCivil judgmentJul 17, 2025
United States and the States of Georgia, Colorado, and South Carolina Obtain $114.5M in Judgments in a Sprawling Cancer Genetic Testing Lab Scheme
Premier Medical, its owner and compliance vice president paid kickbacks to Freedom Medical Labs and its marketers, who collected DNA samples from Medicaid beneficiaries in public spaces and purchased telemedicine physician orders, to bill Medicaid for medically unnecessary cancer genetic testing.
DOJIndictedJun 30, 2025
S.C. Cases Among Hundreds Announced in National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Two defendants were charged with submitting false claims to Medicare and Medicaid for durable medical equipment that was not delivered or authorized, and with billing the Veterans Administration for massage therapy services not rendered.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.