Providers
NAPAIDENCE OPCO, LLC
NPI 1669914107, organization, Napa, CA, Skilled Nursing Facility
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00041, ranked 41 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 5022, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00041 ranked 4177 providers around Riverside, CA: 10 hospices, 29 home health agencies, 38 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | NAPAIDENCE OPCO, LLC (also NAPA POST ACUTE) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | November 15, 2016, last updated August 20, 2024 |
| Practice location | 705 TRANCAS ST, Napa, CA 94558-3014, 707-255-6060 |
| Mailing address | 262 N UNIVERSITY AVE, Farmington, UT 84025-2975 |
| Authorized official | JOHN MITCHELL (Secretary) |
| Specialties | Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
Medicaid, largest codes
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99304 | Initial nursing facility care with straightforward or low level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 25 minutes | $17K | 100% | $208 | $14 (top 5% from $148) | 96th percentile |
In this area
6 providers in Napa County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $1.3M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 3 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 3.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | PETUNIA HOLDINGS, LLC Napa, CA, ranked 1491 | $21K |
|
| 3 | VETERANS HOME OF CALIFORNIA Yountville, CA, ranked 2988 | $0 |
|
| 3 | DANNY'S HOME HEALTH CARE INC. Napa, CA, ranked 3037 | $0 |
|
| 4 | AMY MONTANEZ Napa, CA, ranked 8935 | $1.2M |
|
| 4 | TERESA SHINDER Saint Helena, CA, ranked 9597 | $72K |
|
| 4 | DAVID GORCHOFF Napa, CA, ranked 9762 | $4K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.