Providers

DANNY'S HOME HEALTH CARE INC.

NPI 1942743745, organization, Napa, CA, Home Health

3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
  • Part of provider network D1-00045, ranked 45 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 3037, $0 at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameDANNY'S HOME HEALTH CARE INC.
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedNovember 28, 2016, last updated October 2, 2025
Practice location1832 SOSCOL AVE STE 115-116, Napa, CA 94559-1350, 707-261-0126
Mailing address1701 NORTHFIELD DR, Rochester Hills, MI 48309-3819
Authorized officialZIAD KASSAB (CEO/Owner)
Specialties
Home Health (251E00000X, primary)

In this area

6 providers in Napa County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $1.3M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 3 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 3.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3PETUNIA HOLDINGS, LLC
Napa, CA, ranked 1491
$21K
  • Part of provider network D1-00041, ranked 41 nationally.
3VETERANS HOME OF CALIFORNIA
Yountville, CA, ranked 2988
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00138, ranked 138 nationally.
3NAPAIDENCE OPCO, LLC
Napa, CA, ranked 5022
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00041, ranked 41 nationally.
4AMY MONTANEZ
Napa, CA, ranked 8935
$1.2M
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month under one organization, which can be supervisory billing.
  • Records needed.
4TERESA SHINDER
Saint Helena, CA, ranked 9597
$72K
  • Hours beyond a day in 8 months, but with up to 1729 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
4DAVID GORCHOFF
Napa, CA, ranked 9762
$4K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 1549 patients a month across 4 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.