Providers

SEAN LOUDIN, MD

NPI 1770797839, individual, Charleston, SC, Pediatrics, Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine

5
Evidence tier
informational
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 99232 ($261 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
score 33 of 100, rank 10519, $29K at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameSEAN LOUDIN, MD
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedMay 9, 2007, last updated February 26, 2021
Practice location316 CALHOUN ST, Charleston, SC 29401-1113, 843-402-1638
Mailing addressPO BOX 751649, Charlotte, NC 28275-1649
Specialties
Pediatrics (208000000X, license 31205 SC)
Pediatrics, Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (2080N0001X, primary, license 31205 SC)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99479Medicaid service code$108K30%$584$347 (top 5% from $691)91st percentile
99469Medicaid service code$104K29%$1K$1K (top 5% from $2K)too few months to rank
99232Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 35 minutes$66K19%$261$67 (top 5% from $174)99th percentile
99480Medicaid service code$54K15%$434$308 (top 5% from $558)85th percentile
99468Medicaid service code$23K6%$866$815 (top 5% from $1K)too few months to rank
99239Hospital discharge day management, more than 30 minutes$2K1%$87$49 (top 5% from $101)too few months to rank
99238Hospital discharge day management, 30 minutes or less$7100%$55$48 (top 5% from $80)too few months to rank

In this area

11 providers in Charleston County, SC carry an indicator in the public record, with $6.0M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 5 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 4. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1KEVIN PATEL
Charleston, SC, ranked 226
$26K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since February 18, 2021.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 8 later months, $25,913 in total.
3ROPER ST FRANCIS ANCILLARY SERVICES
Ladson, SC, ranked 804
$328K
  • Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code A9900 ($504 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
3LUTHERAN HOMES OF SC, INC.
MT Pleasant, SC, ranked 4250
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00104, ranked 104 nationally.
3ROPER HOSPITAL INC
Ladson, SC, ranked 5775
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
3BISHOP GADSDEN EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT COMMUNITY
Charleston, SC, ranked 6977
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
4DARREN PERRY
North Charleston, SC, ranked 7349
$208K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month under one organization, which can be supervisory billing.
  • Records needed.
  • and 2 more
4AMANDA ACREE
Mount Pleasant, SC, ranked 7728
$1.7M
  • Hours beyond a day in 8 months under one organization, which can be supervisory billing.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4SHIRLEY FORD
N Charleston, SC, ranked 8745
$1.9M
  • Hours beyond a day in 12 months, but with up to 517 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
All 11 in SC

Recent enforcement in SC

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJIndictedMar 11, 2026
Former Greenville CEO, Employees Indicted in Multi-Million Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme
The defendants submitted false claims to health care benefit programs for individual COVID-19 tests that had actually been pooled for combined processing and manipulated test processing software, billing for tests that were virtually worthless and ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJSentencedFeb 25, 2026
Lancaster Trio Sentenced for Health Care Fraud Conspiracy
An excluded Medicaid provider and his wife established Transformation Services in her name to bill Medicaid for behavioral health services that were overlapping, not rendered individually, and provided by unlicensed therapists, defrauding Medicaid of nearly $250,000.
DOJIndictedNov 18, 2025
Florida Man Indicted for Health Care Fraud, Wire Fraud in Durable Medical Equipment Scheme
Weinberger, who was excluded from Medicare, allegedly concealed his ownership and control of a Medicare-enrolled durable medical equipment company through a false enrollment document and, with coconspirators, used call centers to generate doctors' orders for orthotic braces and submit approximately $6.7 million in false and fraudulent claims obtained through kickbacks and bribes, medically unnecessary, or otherwise ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJCivil judgmentJul 17, 2025
United States and the States of Georgia, Colorado, and South Carolina Obtain $114.5M in Judgments in a Sprawling Cancer Genetic Testing Lab Scheme
Premier Medical, its owner and compliance vice president paid kickbacks to Freedom Medical Labs and its marketers, who collected DNA samples from Medicaid beneficiaries in public spaces and purchased telemedicine physician orders, to bill Medicaid for medically unnecessary cancer genetic testing.
DOJIndictedJun 30, 2025
S.C. Cases Among Hundreds Announced in National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Two defendants were charged with submitting false claims to Medicare and Medicaid for durable medical equipment that was not delivered or authorized, and with billing the Veterans Administration for massage therapy services not rendered.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.