Providers

TAMMY A SWITZER, NP

NPI 1801221569, individual, Parker, CO, Nurse Practitioner

1
Evidence tier
documented action, then payment
  • Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list since July 7, 2022.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 16 later months, $37,476 in total.
score 95 of 100, rank 206, $37K at stake

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
CA Medicaid exclusion list
ca medi-cal suspended & ineligible provider list (july 2026)
Exact NPI, name verifiedJul 7, 2022still open16Sep 2022Dec 2023$37K$19K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameTAMMY A SWITZER, NP
TypeIndividual, sole proprietor
StatusActive
NPI issuedSeptember 12, 2013, last updated August 20, 2021
Practice location12230 LIONESS WAY, Parker, CO 80134-5603, 720-644-9355
Specialties
Nurse Practitioner (363L00000X, primary, license APN.0990747-NP CO)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99309Subsequent nursing facility care with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 30 minutes$54K47%$35$21 (top 5% from $84)75th percentile
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$39K34%$71$60 (top 5% from $133)62nd percentile
99310Subsequent nursing facility care with high level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 45 minutes$11K10%$38$30 (top 5% from $134)60th percentile
99490Chronic care management services, first 20 minutes of clinical staff time directed by health care professional, per calendar month$4K4%$8.55$6.11 (top 5% from $38)62nd percentile
80307Testing for presence of drug, by chemistry analyzers$1K1%$15$45 (top 5% from $110)too few months to rank
80373Medicaid service code$7861%$17$10 (top 5% from $21)too few months to rank
80365Medicaid service code$7861%$17$9.14 (top 5% from $23)too few months to rank
80362Medicaid service code$7861%$17$11 (top 5% from $28)too few months to rank

In this area

10 providers in Douglas County, CO carry an indicator in the public record, with $11.8M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 9 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 1.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3CENTER AT LINCOLN, LLC
Parker, CO, ranked 2979
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00140, ranked 140 nationally.
4MATTHEW GRZEGOZEWSKI
Lone Tree, CO, ranked 7510
$3.7M
  • Hours beyond a day in 15 months, but with up to 365 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4JOSEPH LADIKA
Highlands Ranch, CO, ranked 7935
$508K
  • Hours beyond a day in 2 months, but with up to 901 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4NEDA ARAMI
Castle Pines, CO, ranked 9710
$19K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 125 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
5ELIZABETH QUAIFE
Parker, CO, ranked 10175
$741K
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code T1000 ($19142 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
5KATIE KOSTELYK
Castle Pines, CO, ranked 10534
$2.1M
  • 75% of Medicaid dollars are on codes with a history of abuse.
5MELANIE MORRIS
Highlands Ranch, CO, ranked 10709
$3.9M
5AISLYN NELSON
Parker, CO, ranked 11123
$732K
All 10 in CO

Recent enforcement in CO

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Colorado Man Charged In Medicaid Fraud Scheme Connected To Arapahoe County Adult Daycare
Omer offered three $500 kickback payments in exchange for referrals of Medicaid beneficiaries for adult daycare, and $10,000 in other kickback payments described as marketing expenses or office supply, to induce beneficiaries to attend Nadina Adult Daycare Center.
DOJCivil settlementNov 24, 2025
Southern Colorado Hospital and Doctors Agree to Pay $650,000 to Resolve Allegations That They Unlawfully Prescribed Opioids and Other Controlled Substances
Three physicians employed by Mt. San Rafael Hospital allegedly issued invalid prescriptions for controlled substances including opioids not for a legitimate medical purpose or outside the usual course of professional practice, and caused claims for those prescriptions to be submitted to Medicare and other federal health care programs.
DOJCivil settlementDec 3, 2024
$2 Million Resolves Kickback Allegations Relating to Denver Neuromonitoring Company
Assure paid remuneration to surgeons through joint venture companies to induce them to order intraoperative neuromonitoring services, resulting in claims submitted to federally funded healthcare programs.
DOJIndictedSep 24, 2024
Seven People Charged With Over $40 Million In Medicare And Medicaid Fraud
Defendants, through genetic testing laboratories they owned and operated, paid kickbacks and bribes to marketing companies for referrals for medically unnecessary genetic testing, resulting in more than $40 million in false and fraudulent claims paid by Medicare and Colorado Medicaid, and three defendants laundered the proceeds.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.