Providers

CENTER AT LINCOLN, LLC

NPI 1942574751, organization, Parker, CO, Skilled Nursing Facility

3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
  • Part of provider network D1-00140, ranked 140 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 2979, $0 at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameCENTER AT LINCOLN, LLC (also THE CENTER AT LINCOLN)
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedFebruary 27, 2012, last updated November 8, 2017
Practice location12230 LIONESS WAY, Parker, CO 80134-5603, 720-214-7777
Authorized officialALEXANDER SENKOFF (Manager)
Specialties
Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary)

In this area

10 providers in Douglas County, CO carry an indicator in the public record, with $11.8M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 9 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1TAMMY SWITZER
Parker, CO, ranked 206
$37K
  • Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list since July 7, 2022.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 16 later months, $37,476 in total.
4MATTHEW GRZEGOZEWSKI
Lone Tree, CO, ranked 7510
$3.7M
  • Hours beyond a day in 15 months, but with up to 365 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4JOSEPH LADIKA
Highlands Ranch, CO, ranked 7935
$508K
  • Hours beyond a day in 2 months, but with up to 901 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4NEDA ARAMI
Castle Pines, CO, ranked 9710
$19K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 125 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
5ELIZABETH QUAIFE
Parker, CO, ranked 10175
$741K
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code T1000 ($19142 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
5KATIE KOSTELYK
Castle Pines, CO, ranked 10534
$2.1M
  • 75% of Medicaid dollars are on codes with a history of abuse.
5MELANIE MORRIS
Highlands Ranch, CO, ranked 10709
$3.9M
5AISLYN NELSON
Parker, CO, ranked 11123
$732K
All 10 in CO

Recent enforcement in CO

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Colorado Man Charged In Medicaid Fraud Scheme Connected To Arapahoe County Adult Daycare
Omer offered three $500 kickback payments in exchange for referrals of Medicaid beneficiaries for adult daycare, and $10,000 in other kickback payments described as marketing expenses or office supply, to induce beneficiaries to attend Nadina Adult Daycare Center.
DOJCivil settlementNov 24, 2025
Southern Colorado Hospital and Doctors Agree to Pay $650,000 to Resolve Allegations That They Unlawfully Prescribed Opioids and Other Controlled Substances
Three physicians employed by Mt. San Rafael Hospital allegedly issued invalid prescriptions for controlled substances including opioids not for a legitimate medical purpose or outside the usual course of professional practice, and caused claims for those prescriptions to be submitted to Medicare and other federal health care programs.
DOJCivil settlementDec 3, 2024
$2 Million Resolves Kickback Allegations Relating to Denver Neuromonitoring Company
Assure paid remuneration to surgeons through joint venture companies to induce them to order intraoperative neuromonitoring services, resulting in claims submitted to federally funded healthcare programs.
DOJIndictedSep 24, 2024
Seven People Charged With Over $40 Million In Medicare And Medicaid Fraud
Defendants, through genetic testing laboratories they owned and operated, paid kickbacks and bribes to marketing companies for referrals for medically unnecessary genetic testing, resulting in more than $40 million in false and fraudulent claims paid by Medicare and Colorado Medicaid, and three defendants laundered the proceeds.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.