Providers
All 70 in CA
FOWLER CARE CENTER LLC
NPI 1952969024, organization, Fowler, CA, Skilled Nursing Facility
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00087, ranked 87 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 3629, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00087 ranked 8786 providers around Eau Claire, WI: 1 hospice, 1 home health agency, 84 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | FOWLER CARE CENTER LLC (also FOWLER CARE CENTER) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | June 3, 2019, last updated January 30, 2024 |
| Practice location | 8448 E ADAMS AVE, Fowler, CA 93625-9773, 559-834-2519 |
| Mailing address | 4525 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 210, Los Angeles, CA 90010-3846 |
| Authorized official | Aaron Chesley (Ceo) |
| Specialties | Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary) |
In this area
70 providers in Fresno County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $17.8M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 37 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 31. 2 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FELIPE RUIZ Clovis, CA, ranked 355 | $3K |
|
| 1 | GOT SLEEP INC Fresno, CA, ranked 520 | $0 |
|
| 3 | COMPASSIONATE CARE HOME HEALTH Fresno, CA, ranked 789 | $1.1M |
|
| 3 | FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER Fresno, CA, ranked 1078 | $790K |
|
| 3 | ST.MARY'S HOME HEALTH SERVICES,INC. Fresno, CA, ranked 1143 | $513K |
|
| 3 | CARELIFE HOSPICE, INC. Fresno, CA, ranked 1414 | $54K |
|
| 3 | HEALTHCARE CALIFORNIA Fresno, CA, ranked 1622 | $3K |
|
| 3 | REEDLEY SKILLED CARE LLC Reedley, CA, ranked 1971 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.