Providers
All 18 in PA
HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM
NPI 1447224597, organization, Philadelphia, PA, Hospice Care, Community Based
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00127, ranked 127 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 2948, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00127 ranked 12759 providers around Philadelphia, PA: 12 hospices, 11 home health agencies, 36 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM (also HOLY REDEEMER HOSPICE - PA) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | February 15, 2006, last updated October 3, 2022 |
| Practice location | 12265 TOWNSEND RD, Philadelphia, PA 19154-1201, 800-346-6462 |
| Authorized official | GEORGE HAMILTON (VP Finance) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary, license 151499 PA) |
In this area
18 providers in Philadelphia County, PA carry an indicator in the public record, with $12.2M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 9 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 5. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRETT WILLS Phila, PA, ranked 439 | $148 |
|
| 3 | HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM Philadelphia, PA, ranked 1307 | $155K |
|
| 3 | JEFFHOME PA, LLC. Philadelphia, PA, ranked 1458 | $32K |
|
| 3 | GHODRAT SHOLEVAR Philadelphia, PA, ranked 1736 | $26 |
|
| 3 | PAUL'S RUN Philadelphia, PA, ranked 2909 | $0 |
|
| 3 | HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM Philadelphia, PA, ranked 4893 | $0 |
|
| 3 | SIMPSON HOUSE INC. Philadelphia, PA, ranked 5188 | $0 |
|
| 3 | JOSEPH NORRIS Philadelphia, PA, ranked 6858 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in PA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJChargedAug 4, 2026
The Fraud Division Announces Charges Against 19 Defendants for Medicaid Home Health Aid Schemes
Nineteen defendants, including owners and employees of home care companies, home health aides, and Medicaid recipients, were charged with submitting claims for home care services that were not provided, including claims for hours when purported aides were incarcerated, hospitalized, working other jobs, or traveling overseas.
DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Two Doctors, Physician’s Assistant Charged With Unlawfully Distributing Controlled Substances Via Voicemail “Refill Line”
From January 2020 through March 2025 the defendants allegedly operated a voicemail refill line that allowed patients to receive refills of Schedule II controlled substance prescriptions, namely oxycodone and amphetamine, without interacting with a licensed prescriber, and submitted prescriptions in another medical professional's name to deceive pharmacies.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Scranton Woman Charged With Conspiracy To Commit Bank Fraud With Funds Derived From Federal Health Care Programs
Beaubrun is alleged to have stolen and appropriated checks intended by Entity #1 for various payees, including funds derived from Medicare and Medicaid, and endorsed them to herself, causing a loss of over $300,000.
DOJCivil settlementJun 10, 2026
Ahold Delhaize USA Inc. to Pay $40M for Allegedly Reporting Inflated Drug Prices on Claims to Federal Healthcare Programs
Ahold Delhaize's in-store retail pharmacies operated prescription savings programs offering discounted prices but failed to report those discounted prices as their "usual and customary" prices on claims to Medicare Part D, Medicaid and TRICARE, causing those programs to pay inflated amounts.
DOJCivil settlementJun 10, 2026
Ahold Delhaize USA Inc. to Pay $40M for Allegedly Reporting Inflated Drug Prices on Claims to Federal Healthcare Programs
Ahold Delhaize supermarket pharmacies operated prescription savings programs offering discounted prices but failed to report those discounted prices as their "usual and customary" prices on claims to Medicare Part D, Medicaid, and TRICARE, causing those programs to pay inflated amounts.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.