Providers
All 11 in NJ
CONCORD HEALTHCARE, LLC
NPI 1699740894, organization, Lakewood, NJ, Skilled Nursing Facility
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00160 ranked 16091 providers around West Covina, CA: 7 hospices, 10 home health agencies, 74 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | CONCORD HEALTHCARE, LLC (also CONCORD HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | February 21, 2006, last updated August 22, 2020 |
| Practice location | 963 OCEAN AVE, Lakewood, NJ 08701-3649, 732-367-7444 |
| Authorized official | Colev Gestetner (Managing Member) |
| Specialties | Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary, license NJ061519 NJ) |
In this area
11 providers in Ocean County, NJ carry an indicator in the public record, with $21.0M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 7 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 3.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | AFFINITY CARE OF NJ LLC Brick, NJ, ranked 917 | $5.2M |
|
| 3 | RIVERFRONT HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATES INC Bayville, NJ, ranked 1728 | $81 |
|
| 3 | SHORE HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC. Lakewood, NJ, ranked 1738 | $16 |
|
| 3 | NIKKI STEIDLE Toms River, NJ, ranked 7197 | $0 |
|
| 4 | CLARA SUROWITZ Lakewood, NJ, ranked 7986 | $332K |
|
| 4 | ROBERT SHANIK Toms River, NJ, ranked 8109 | $30K |
|
| 4 | ELI EILENBERG Lakewood, NJ, ranked 8349 | $6.7M |
|
| 4 | HILLEL PELTZ Lakewood, NJ, ranked 8373 | $5.9M |
|
Recent enforcement in NJ
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJIndictedJul 29, 2026
Fraud Division Resolves Fraud Investigation of Eye Care Group Under New Corporate Enforcement Policy; Health Care Executive Charged for Alleged Fraud and Kickbacks
DiDonato allegedly conspired to defraud Medicare by billing for unnecessary and duplicative diagnostic eye tests and paid kickbacks and bribes to ophthalmologists disguised as consulting fees for patient referrals, while Campus Eye received a declination after self-disclosing and agreed to pay back $1 million to victims.
DOJIndictedJul 29, 2026
Founder And Former CEO of New Jersey Based Eye Care Group Charged with Health Care Fraud Conspiracy and Paying Illegal Kickbacks
DiDonato allegedly paid kickbacks disguised as consulting fees to ophthalmologists for patient referrals and billed Medicare approximately $3.4 million for duplicative or unnecessary diagnostic tests performed at his optometry practice and eye surgery center.
DOJChargedJul 9, 2026
Six Individuals, Including a Pharmacist and Doctor, Charged in Connection with $20 Million Healthcare Fraud and Kickback Scheme
A pharmacy owner paid cash kickbacks to a doctor, advanced practice nurses, and an office manager in exchange for medically unnecessary prescriptions for high-reimbursement medications billed to Medicare and Medicaid.
DOJPleaded guiltyJun 24, 2026
Cape May County Psychiatrist Admits to 17 Felony Counts for Unlawful Controlled Substance Prescriptions Linked to Sexual Conduct, Risk of Death, and Serious Bodily Injury
A psychiatrist issued invalid prescriptions for Adderall, Vyvanse, and Xanax to 17 patients outside the usual course of professional practice, with intent to defraud and mislead the dispensing pharmacies and the insurers, government benefits programs, and other third parties who paid for the drugs, sometimes in exchange for sexual activities, images, or videos.
DOJSentencedMay 21, 2026
New Jersey Physical Therapist Sentenced to 12 Months in Prison for Health Care Fraud Scheme Targeting Amtrak
Kim, a licensed physical therapist, allowed her license and business bank accounts to be used to bill Amtrak's health care plan for claims for services that never were provided and were medically unnecessary, in return for a portion of the proceeds.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.