Providers
All 19 in PA
ECHO HOSPICE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
NPI 1740867829, organization, Philadelphia, PA, Hospice Care, Community Based
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00198 ranked 198138 providers around Los Angeles, CA: 18 hospices, 17 home health agencies, 103 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | ECHO HOSPICE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | March 25, 2021, last updated January 29, 2026 |
| Practice location | 421 N 7TH ST STE 602, Philadelphia, PA 19123-3926, 267-551-5708 |
| Mailing address | 7817 IVANHOE AVE STE 101, LA Jolla, CA 92037-4541 |
| Authorized official | CHRISTOPHER LACKNER (Manager) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary) |
In this area
19 providers in Philadelphia County, PA carry an indicator in the public record, with $12.2M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 9 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 6. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRETT WILLS Phila, PA, ranked 439 | $148 |
|
| 3 | HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM Philadelphia, PA, ranked 1307 | $155K |
|
| 3 | JEFFHOME PA, LLC. Philadelphia, PA, ranked 1458 | $32K |
|
| 3 | GHODRAT SHOLEVAR Philadelphia, PA, ranked 1736 | $26 |
|
| 3 | PAUL'S RUN Philadelphia, PA, ranked 2909 | $0 |
|
| 3 | HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM Philadelphia, PA, ranked 2948 | $0 |
|
| 3 | HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM Philadelphia, PA, ranked 4893 | $0 |
|
| 3 | SIMPSON HOUSE INC. Philadelphia, PA, ranked 5188 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in PA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJChargedAug 4, 2026
The Fraud Division Announces Charges Against 19 Defendants for Medicaid Home Health Aid Schemes
Nineteen defendants, including owners and employees of home care companies, home health aides, and Medicaid recipients, were charged with submitting claims for home care services that were not provided, including claims for hours when purported aides were incarcerated, hospitalized, working other jobs, or traveling overseas.
DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Two Doctors, Physician’s Assistant Charged With Unlawfully Distributing Controlled Substances Via Voicemail “Refill Line”
From January 2020 through March 2025 the defendants allegedly operated a voicemail refill line that allowed patients to receive refills of Schedule II controlled substance prescriptions, namely oxycodone and amphetamine, without interacting with a licensed prescriber, and submitted prescriptions in another medical professional's name to deceive pharmacies.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Scranton Woman Charged With Conspiracy To Commit Bank Fraud With Funds Derived From Federal Health Care Programs
Beaubrun is alleged to have stolen and appropriated checks intended by Entity #1 for various payees, including funds derived from Medicare and Medicaid, and endorsed them to herself, causing a loss of over $300,000.
DOJCivil settlementJun 10, 2026
Ahold Delhaize USA Inc. to Pay $40M for Allegedly Reporting Inflated Drug Prices on Claims to Federal Healthcare Programs
Ahold Delhaize's in-store retail pharmacies operated prescription savings programs offering discounted prices but failed to report those discounted prices as their "usual and customary" prices on claims to Medicare Part D, Medicaid and TRICARE, causing those programs to pay inflated amounts.
DOJCivil settlementJun 10, 2026
Ahold Delhaize USA Inc. to Pay $40M for Allegedly Reporting Inflated Drug Prices on Claims to Federal Healthcare Programs
Ahold Delhaize supermarket pharmacies operated prescription savings programs offering discounted prices but failed to report those discounted prices as their "usual and customary" prices on claims to Medicare Part D, Medicaid, and TRICARE, causing those programs to pay inflated amounts.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.