Providers

SUSAN GAIL MORRIS, FNP

NPI 1750412052, individual, Springfield, MO, Nurse Practitioner

1
Evidence tier
documented action, then payment
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since June 13, 2019.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 4 later months, $2,023 in total.
score 93 of 100, rank 367, $2K at stake

Public list actions

Medicare revocation effective June 13, 2019, barred from re-enrolling until June 13, 2029
424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies, Practitioner - Nurse Practitioner, MO
OIG exclusion May 20, 2024 under section 1128a4
Ind- Lic HC Serv Pro, Nurse Practitioner (, Springfield, MO

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
Medicare revocation list
424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies
Exact NPI, name verifiedJun 13, 2019Jun 13, 20294Aug 2019Dec 2019$2K$4K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameSUSAN GAIL MORRIS, FNP
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedMarch 8, 2007, last updated September 5, 2018
Practice location1911 S NATIONAL AVE STE 301, Springfield, MO 65804, 417-725-8250
Specialties
Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care (363LP2300X, license RN2002015397 MO)
Nurse Practitioner (363L00000X, primary, license 2002105397 MO)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$8K100%$28$60 (top 5% from $133)14th percentile

In this area

11 providers in Greene County, MO carry an indicator in the public record, with $20.6M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 8 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 3.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3NHC HEALTHCARE-SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI LLC
Springfield, MO, ranked 2429
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00134, ranked 134 nationally.
3SEASONS HOSPICE INC
Springfield, MO, ranked 2516
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00134, ranked 134 nationally.
3TRADITIONS HEALTH CARE OF SPRINGFIELD, LLC
Springfield, MO, ranked 2711
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00051, ranked 51 nationally.
4DELORES BROWN
Springfield, MO, ranked 7607
$2.6M
  • Hours beyond a day in 3 months, but with up to 272 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4ANGELA KING
Springfield, MO, ranked 8064
$11.2M
  • Hours beyond a day in 6 months, but with up to 3392 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4LAURA MORENO GARCIA
Springfield, MO, ranked 8720
$2.0M
  • Hours beyond a day in 11 months, but with up to 2262 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
4THOMAS DAHLBERG
Springfield, MO, ranked 9372
$283K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month under one organization, which can be supervisory billing.
  • Records needed.
4KERRY PARNELL
Springfield, MO, ranked 9708
$19K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 173 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
All 11 in MO

Recent enforcement in MO

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Kansas Chiropractor Pleads Guilty to Health Care Fraud
Laser submitted claims to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City seeking payment for chiropractic services purportedly rendered on dates when patients had not visited Laser Chiropractic and received no treatment, including billing using the information of an individual who never received treatment.
DOJIndictedJul 30, 2026
Adult Day Care Provider Accused of $1.47 Million Missouri Medicaid Fraud
King submitted $1.47 million in false claims to Missouri Medicaid through Agape Love Adult Day Care LLC for services never provided, claiming 10 hours of care per day when only half that was provided and billing for patients who were absent or hospitalized.
DOJSentencedJul 21, 2026
Home Health Care Operator Sentenced for Defrauding Missouri Medicaid
Childress submitted fraudulent enrollment documents concealing her ownership of a home health care company and then billed Missouri Medicaid for home health services that were never provided.
DOJComplaint filedJun 23, 2026
Federal Health Care Fraud Takedown Targets 455 Defendants and $6.5 Billion in False Claims
Four defendants were charged by complaint in the Western District of Missouri with forgery and using fraudulent nursing credentials or with false statements to receive health care payments and stealing by deceit for Medicaid claims for personal care services that were not provided.
DOJIndictedJun 3, 2026
U.S. Attorney’s Office Seeks Potential Victims in Case Against Columbia, Missouri Doctor
A federal grand jury charged Morris with issuing controlled substance prescriptions outside the usual course of professional practice and with defrauding Medicare and Missouri Medicaid by billing for services falsely representing him as the rendering provider when services were rendered by assistant physicians and by submitting claims for prescriptions not eligible for reimbursement.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.